MPs have filed a defamation lawsuit in opposition to former President Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz. On April 15, in an interview with Jeune Afrique, former President Aziz accused the parliament of receiving the 300 million ouguiyas mum from the federal government, ie. comparable to virtually € 700,000 to vote in favor of establishing a parliamentary fee of inquiry on its administration between 2008 and 2019.
as reported from Nouakchott, Salem Mejbour Salem
The Fee was arrange in January final 12 months and offered a report that overwhelms the previous president. In response to the latter’s allegations, MPs’ legal professionals hosted a press convention on Thursday evening within the presence of deputies, who certified as “inadmissible” the previous head of state’s exit in opposition to parliament.
“We parliamentarians, representing the Mauritanian folks, are deeply outraged by the remarks of the one that presided over the destiny of Mauritania for ten years,” mentioned Mohamed Lemine Amar, certainly one of the parliamentarians who filed the grievance in opposition to the previous Mauritanian president. . These are dangerous statements. Critical affirmations with none proof that assaults our honor and our dignity. False accusations by which their authors, past males, intention to break the picture of Parliament. We’re decided to scrub our glory. ”
That is the problem that legal professionals intend to handle in courtroom. “The extent of the harm to all of the deputies of the Nationwide Meeting has pushed the latter to take authorized motion in order that they may be correctly cleared and rehabilitated, as they know that these declarations are opposite to the Penal Code, the Freedom of the Press Act and the legislation on the combat in opposition to info manipulation,” Maitre defined. Diagana Ibrahim, a member of the Civil Social gathering’s protection collective.
In line with certainly one of his legal professionals, Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz just isn’t in any respect impressed by the deputies’ complaints. He repeated his phrases to the police on Thursday evening throughout his first summons within the context of this act.
.
