Mogadishu (AX) – On Thursday, the Somali Council of Ministers reached a significant milestone, formally endorsing a list of nine candidates for appointment to the National Independent Human Rights Commission (NIHRC). Convened under the leadership of Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre, this weekly session marked a pivotal moment in Somalia’s ongoing efforts to build a robust human rights institution.
- Advertisement -
The nominations, which originated from the Minister of Family and Human Rights Development, were the result of what the government described as a “rigorous and transparent selection process.” This process, purportedly adhering to Articles 8, 15, 16, and 17(1) and (2) of Law No. 16, enacted on June 27, 2016, was portrayed as a noteworthy exercise in due diligence.
According to an official government statement, the selected candidates were evaluated on factors such as merit, integrity, and professional competence. These criteria align with internationally recognized standards, including the Paris Principles, which serve as a benchmark for human rights institutions worldwide. It’s reassuring to know that Somalia is aspiring to meet the expectations set by entities like the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI). After all, the commitment to uphold human rights should not merely be a governmental checklist; it ought to resonate throughout the fabric of societal values.
The Council’s endorsement, while decidedly a step forward, is far from just a bureaucratic formality. It signifies Somalia’s enduring struggle to create an independent human rights institution recognized for its credibility. In a nation where the rule of law has often been elusive, this initiative serves as a beacon of hope for many who believe in justice and accountability. But how soon can we expect this to translate into tangible improvements in human rights conditions on the ground? This is a question that lingers in the minds of many Somalis.
Yet, this optimistic news is marred by controversy stemming from the Somali Salvation Forum, a coalition of opposition political actors who have voiced strong objections to the nomination process. They claim the federal government has engaged in unlawful interference, casting a shadow over the transparency that was promised in the selection process.
In their statement, the Forum articulated, “The government’s actions undermine the independence of the commission and compromise its credibility.” Such assertions aren’t merely political rhetoric; they highlight the fragile trust that exists between the federal government and various opposition factions. This trust is imperative for fostering a truly independent body that can monitor human rights without fear or favor. Have we not seen enough instances in global contexts where governmental overreach erodes the foundational principles of independent institutions?
This ongoing dispute unfolds against a backdrop of broader tensions between the federal government and opposition forces. These tensions are not isolated incidents but part of a much larger narrative, one that involves constitutional reforms, the upcoming electoral process, and the urgent need for independent oversight bodies. The juxtaposition of aspirations and grievances can often feel like a juggling act in a precarious circus.
Perhaps one of the most critical elements of this unfolding drama is the importance of dialogue. It’s not merely about crafting policies but rather nurturing an environment where diverse voices can contribute to the national discourse. As the Somali proverb goes, “One hand cannot clap.” This age-old wisdom resonates deeply in the context of nation-building. Without mutual respect and collaboration, achieving meaningful progress remains a distant goal.
The current controversy does serve as a reminder of the complexities and challenges that lie ahead on Somalia’s path toward state-building. Striking a delicate balance between political consensus and institutional development is no easy feat. It requires patience, courage, and, most importantly, a commitment to the ideals of governance that places human rights at its core.
As we navigate these turbulent waters, it becomes increasingly clear that the road ahead will demand more than the fortification of laws and institutions. It will also require an ongoing dialogue among the populace, encouraging them to engage with their rights—both as citizens and as stakeholders in the nation’s future. A country’s strength often lies not in its laws but in the hearts and minds of its people, ready to advocate for justice and uphold integrity.
In this chapter of Somalia’s narrative, we are reminded that while progress may be incremental and often riddled with obstacles, the ultimate goal of establishing a fair and just society remains an aspiration worth pursuing. As citizens, leaders, and advocates, let us hold onto hope while also fostering a culture of accountability and transparency—two essential ingredients for enduring success.
Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times International – Monitoring
