Mastodon

Kenyan National Indicted as U.S. Feeding Our Future Child Nutrition Fraud Widens

Kenyan man indicted in U.S. child-nutrition fraud probe as investigators trace money to Nairobi real estate

MINNEAPOLIS — A global money trail in a sprawling pandemic fraud case

U.S. prosecutors have charged a 28-year-old Kenyan man with helping move and hide money stolen from a U.S. child nutrition program during the pandemic, a case that underscores how easily relief dollars slipped across borders and into private fortunes.

- Advertisement -

Federal authorities say Ahmednaji Maalim Aftin Sheikh, who lives in Nairobi, acted as a conduit for his older brother, Abdiaziz Shafii Farah—already sentenced to 28 years in prison for leading an outfit prosecutors called the “Empire” group. In court filings, investigators allege Sheikh received wire transfers and bulk cash from Farah and used it to buy property in Kenya, including an apartment building in Nairobi’s South C neighborhood, just a short drive from Nairobi National Park, and land in Mandera near the border with Somalia and Ethiopia.

The indictment adds another chapter to what the Justice Department has described as the nation’s largest COVID-19 fraud scheme: a plot to siphon more than $250 million from federal programs intended to feed children when schools and community centers were shut. Prosecutors say dozens of defendants fabricated rosters, inflated invoices, and claimed reimbursement for millions of meals never served, exploiting emergency waivers that loosened paperwork and oversight.

A family link, photographs of cash, and coded transfers

Court documents point to an intimate money pipeline between brothers—one operating a scheme in Minnesota, the other acquiring assets in East Africa. Investigators say Farah and Sheikh exchanged photos of fat stacks of currency and coordinated transfers dressed up as “family support.” On Aug. 29, 2021, Sheikh allegedly sent an image of $138,000 in cash. A few weeks later, he sent photos of banker’s boxes filled with $270,000. By late December that year, prosecutors say, he acknowledged receiving more than $1.2 million in transfers. In one exchange detailed by authorities, Farah messaged, “You are gonna be the richest 25 year old InshaAllah,” to which Sheikh replied, “I love you so much.”

Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson, whose office in Minnesota has spearheaded the probe, did not hide his anger. “I share the outrage of my fellow Minnesotans at seeing money meant to feed hungry children converted into fortunes half a world away,” he said. “Sheikh’s indictment shows yet again what we are up against. But we cannot shrink from confronting this crisis.”

FBI Special Agent in Charge Alvin Winston called the conduct “a shameful theft,” saying the defendants turned taxpayer funds for hungry children into foreign real estate investments. The FBI, IRS Criminal Investigations, and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service are leading the inquiry, which has so far charged 74 people and led to the conviction of Feeding Our Future’s former CEO, Aimee Bock, and more than a dozen others, according to prosecutors.

From cafeteria lines to apartment deeds

Few neighborhoods illustrate the global reach of U.S. dollars quite like South C—an area of mid-rise apartments, bustling convenience stores, and steady lines of matatus, the minibuses that ferry Nairobi commuters. Real estate here can turn cash anonymous quickly, particularly when purchases pass through layers of limited companies and nominees. Authorities say Sheikh used sham companies to invest the alleged proceeds in Kenya’s property market, a practice anti-corruption experts warn can frustrate recovery efforts.

The government says funds laundered abroad in this case—including money sent to Sheikh—cannot be clawed back. That stark line raises a quiet, uncomfortable question: How much of the emergency aid, rushed out to prevent hunger and collapse, is now cemented into foreign apartment blocks and discreet land titles?

A pandemic era of loosened rules and moral hazard

In Minnesota, the alleged fraud centered on meal claims meant to run through federally backed child nutrition programs. During the pandemic, rules were relaxed to let community organizations feed children even when schools were closed, a compassionate move that opened cracks for criminality. Investigators say the “Empire” group exploited those gaps, fabricating attendance sheets, forging invoices, and cycling money through shell companies. The government’s top-line figure—more than a quarter-billion dollars—has turned this regional story into a national byword for COVID-19 fraud.

It’s also part of a broader phenomenon. Around the world, emergency relief created opportunities for fast-moving swindles—from unemployment systems overwhelmed by identity theft to small-business loans approved in minutes. In the United States alone, watchdogs have warned that hundreds of billions in pandemic relief were siphoned off or improperly paid, dwarfing the caseloads prosecutors can bring in any given year.

Cross-border justice: can the U.S. bring Sheikh to court?

American officials have not said whether they will seek Sheikh’s extradition. The U.S. and Kenya have a history of judicial cooperation, but extraditions are inherently political and painstaking, especially when the money is already sunk into local assets. Such cases often involve multi-agency coordination, requests for mutual legal assistance, and occasionally Interpol notices. Even if an arrest occurs, long court battles can follow. For Minnesota families and schools who watched meal budgets evaporate, that process can feel like justice on a long delay.

In Mandera—a town of dusty crossroads, traders, and the hum of an economy shaped by three borders—land can be a store of wealth as much as a home. That’s true across much of East Africa, where diaspora remittances often finance construction back home. When that stream is tainted, lines blur between legitimate family support and orchestrated laundering. The Sheikh indictment challenges authorities in both countries to better police capital flows without unfairly stigmatizing the very remittances that sustain households.

Lessons from Minnesota’s biggest pandemic fraud case

What does this episode say about public trust? For one, oversight mechanisms broke down under crisis pressure. Second, the case shows how quickly domestic fraud migrates across borders, especially when convertibility and real estate provide an easy end point. And third, it reflects a prosecutorial pivot—from simply securing convictions to tracing money networks and building transnational cases.

The investigation is still expanding, with dozens already charged. But the moral stakes remain close to home. In a state known for volunteerism and civic pride, prosecutors say a small group chose self-enrichment over service at a moment of national need. The facts laid out in court are chillingly mundane: spreadsheets of imaginary meals, text messages about wire transfers, and candid selfies with piles of cash. They are also tragically familiar to investigators chasing pandemic fraud from Phnom Penh to Phoenix.

What to watch next

  • Whether U.S. authorities move to seek Sheikh’s extradition and how Kenyan courts respond.
  • Efforts to freeze or forfeit assets tied to the alleged laundering—even if direct recovery is unlikely.
  • Further indictments in Minnesota as the case ripples outward from food-program contractors to facilitators and vendors.
  • Policy reforms aimed at preventing a repeat—balancing urgent aid with guardrails that work under stress.

The indictment of Ahmednaji Maalim Aftin Sheikh is a reminder of a hard truth from the pandemic: when institutions rush to meet human need, opportunists will rush to meet themselves. The test, as this case moves from Minneapolis courtrooms to Nairobi deeds offices, is whether justice can cross borders as swiftly as stolen money did.

By Ali Musa
Axadle Times international–Monitoring.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More