Somalia welcomes Egypt’s security backing as new AU stabilization mission looms
MOGADISHU — Somalia on Sunday publicly thanked Egypt for a message of solidarity that included promises of military equipment, training and an expected troop contribution to a forthcoming African Union stabilization mission as Mogadishu seeks to reassert control over territory long contested by insurgents.
- Advertisement -
The gesture, framed by Somalia’s Foreign Ministry as evidence of “historic and deep-rooted ties,” arrives as African Union planners prepare to transition from the current AU presence to a successor stabilization operation. Somali officials said the timing could provide a crucial boost to efforts to restore “peace, security, and rule of law across the country.”
Not just kit: a diplomatic signal
At face value, Egypt’s support — training courses and military equipment — is practical. In practice it carries political weight. For the Somali government, which faces a resilient al-Shabaab insurgency and frequent clan-based violence, outside partners provide not only hardware and muscle but also political cover and legitimacy.
“The message from Egypt comes at a critical time,” the Foreign Ministry said. It is a reminder that alliances in the Horn of Africa are changing as much by politics as by logistics.
Since the early 2000s, African Union missions have been central to Somalia’s efforts to keep al-Shabaab at bay. Troop-contributing countries have included Uganda, Burundi and Kenya, and contributions have ebbed and flowed with politics at home and abroad. Any new wave of forces, including a potential Egyptian contingent, will be absorbed into that complex landscape.
On the streets of Mogadishu
In the capital’s markets and tea stalls, the conversation is less about diplomatic niceties and more about daily security. Shopkeepers routinely point to checkpoints, convoy movements and the visibility of paramilitary units as markers of relative calm. They also remember the days when an attack could close a main artery for weeks.
“We want schools and markets to stay open,” said one teacher in Mogadishu, who requested anonymity for safety. “If foreign help can keep the streets safer, people will welcome it, but they want a plan that lasts.”
The remark reflects a deeper anxiety: foreign support often arrives in bursts linked to headlines, but the root causes of instability — weak institutions, contested governance in the regions, and economic marginalization — require long-term investment beyond the immediate security fix.
What Egypt stands to gain
Egypt’s expanding profile in the Horn can be read through several lenses. Cairo has long-standing cultural and political links with the Horn of Africa and the Red Sea littoral. It also has strategic interests in secure maritime routes and a stable neighborhood, particularly as tensions over regional waterways and the Nile continue to shape its foreign policy.
Contributing troops to a stabilization mission would signal Cairo’s willingness to play a more assertive security role beyond North Africa. It would also join a crowded field of external actors — from Turkey and the United Arab Emirates to regional powers like Ethiopia and Kenya — each carving influence through aid, infrastructure deals and security partnerships.
Risks and questions ahead
International involvement in Somalia has been a double-edged sword. The African Union’s long presence helped prevent state collapse, but the recurring need for external forces underscores persistent governance gaps. There are several questions that will shape whether Egyptian support has the intended effect:
- How many troops and what mandates will foreign contingents hold? Short-term deployments with narrow mandates can blunt threats but do little to address political fissures.
- Will Egypt coordinate closely with Somali institutions and other international partners to ensure coherent strategies rather than competing agendas?
- How will local communities — the ultimate arbiters of security on the ground — be incorporated into stabilization plans so that military gains translate into sustainable peace?
These questions matter beyond Somalia. They touch on broader trends in African security governance: a shift toward more regional responsibility for peace operations, the reassertion of Great Power and middle-power influence in African affairs, and debates over the balance between military solutions and state-building.
Lessons from the past
Observers of Somali affairs point to a recurring pattern: international attention rises after major attacks or political crises, resources flow, and then global attention shifts elsewhere even as local issues fester. That cycle undermines long-term progress and feeds skepticism among Somalis about foreign commitments.
“Sustainable peace requires more than hardware,” a Horn of Africa analyst wrote recently in a policy brief. “It requires predictable funding, political patience and a focus on governance that expands the social contract between people and state.”
If Egypt’s engagement is to be more than a headline, it will need to fit into a comprehensive approach that bolsters Somali capacity while aligning with the African Union and other partners. That means training not only soldiers but also police, judicial officials and community peacebuilders. It means keeping reconstruction and livelihoods programs on track so that security gains protect more than checkpoints.
Looking forward
As the AU reconfigures its footprint and Somalia seeks to reclaim territory and authority, outside partners like Egypt will be watched closely. For a nation exhausted by decades of conflict, promises of support are welcome — but durable peace will be measured by steady schools, open markets and the ability of local courts and administrations to resolve disputes peacefully.
Can external military support be braided into a long-term project of state-building in Somalia? Or will it become another short chapter in a recurring saga of intervention and unmet expectations? The answers will matter not only to Somalis but to a region whose stability is increasingly tied to the decisions made in capitals across Africa and beyond.
By Ali Musa
Axadle Times international–Monitoring.
