Mogadishu (AX) — In a notable development, five opposition parties in Somalia have expressed a cautious openness to President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s recent call for national dialogue. However, they firmly state that their participation hinges on meeting specific conditions designed to ensure the process is inclusive, credible, and firmly rooted in constitutional principles.
- Advertisement -
In a joint statement released on a recent Friday, representatives from parties such as Xaqsoor, Samadoon, DPC, Ramaas, and Dhulka Hooyo articulated their belief that this initiative could offer a much-needed pathway from the country’s enduring political stalemate. Yet, they emphasized that these discussions must be positioned as formal negotiations between the federal government and opposition, not merely a unilateral effort by the current administration.
This cautious optimism reflects the complex history of political dialogue in Somalia. “The president’s call for dialogue must not become another symbolic gesture,” the statement articulated. “Without a clear framework and mutual consent, it risks deepening the very crisis it seeks to resolve.” This thought-provoking assertion frames the necessity of addressing the trust deficit that has plagued past negotiations.
Understanding the delicate balance of power in Somali politics is crucial. In light of this, the opposition bloc has urged the president to officially recognize the consultations as a political negotiation. This means establishing legitimacy through transparency, power-sharing, and strict adherence to constitutional principles. After all, as the saying goes, “trust is the foundation of all relationships.” How can trust be rebuilt if past wounds are neglected?
To clarify their stance, the parties put forth three essential measures:
- The president must publicly affirm that the dialogue will be a structured negotiation between the government and the opposition.
- A joint technical committee should be formed to set the agenda and processes for these discussions.
- It is imperative that the conversations refrain from combining constitutional matters with unrelated issues like national security, as this could derail the intended objectives.
Without these reassurances, the five opposition parties have indicated they will refrain from participating. This is not merely an act of withdrawal but a strategic position aimed at safeguarding democratic principles.
All five parties, which have recently been registered with Somalia’s National Independent Electoral Commission, emphasized their commitment to forthcoming elections, provided the process adheres to fundamental constitutional standards. In a nation where political promises can often feel like mirages, how do these parties envision ensuring accountability in electoral practices?
The opposition has outlined a comprehensive list of seven conditions for any electoral process:
- Alignment with Somalia’s constitution and legal frameworks.
- Participation that is free and fair, devoid of coercion.
- Conduct of elections within the legally mandated timeframe.
- Oversight by an independent and credible electoral body.
- Equal access for all political parties involved.
- Election results that truly reflect the will of the people.
- Clear procedures and timelines agreed upon in advance.
They have expressed an openness to collaborate with the federal government in a manner that respects these standards; nevertheless, they will firmly oppose any initiative that deviates from these foundational requirements. After all, what good is a conversation if it doesn’t lead to constructive actions?
This call for dialogue follows President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s announcement earlier this month, made at a time steeped in reflection after Eid al-Adha. He framed the dialogue as a crucial step toward addressing Somalia’s stalled constitutional review and a potential pathway for national elections. Yet, as history teaches us, good intentions must be paired with sincere actions.
Rising political tensions, delays in electoral reforms, and concerns about exclusionary governance linger heavily in the air. Critics have pointed out that past government-led summits often sidelined opposition voices, resulting in minimal progress. This prompts an important question: can genuine dialogue emerge from a history riddled with distrust?
Ultimately, the five opposition parties underline that their aim is not to be an obstructionist force, but rather to engage meaningfully, anchored in legality and consensus. “Somalia is facing a critical moment,” their statement concluded. “We need a political environment built on trust, transparency, and shared responsibility to navigate this crisis effectively.” It’s a clarion call, an invitation for unity in diversity, and perhaps a pivotal moment in Somalia’s quest for political stability.
By emphasizing the need for a collaborative approach rooted in constitutional integrity, the opposition has presented a framework for dialogue that fosters hope amidst the uncertainty. The challenge now rests with the government: will it listen, or will history repeat itself as another missed opportunity?
Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times International – Monitoring
