Engaging Dialogue for a Prosperous Future in Somalia

In a recent address, Northeastern State President Said Abdullahi Deni delivered a powerful message urging President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud to move away from unilateral decision-making. Deni emphasized the importance of broad-based dialogue that includes all stakeholders in shaping the future of Somalia. “The Somali people are disillusioned with the current state of governance,” he stated firmly. “We need an electoral framework that everyone agrees on. The country cannot move forward unless the Somali people are part of shaping their own future.”

This sentiment resonates deeply within the Somali community, which has grappled with instability and governance challenges for decades. How can a nation flourish when its citizens feel disconnected from the very system that governs them? Deni’s call for change is not merely political; it is rooted in the people’s desire for participation, representation, and, ultimately, hope.

At the forefront of this call for reform is a council led by former MP and Northeastern State electoral commissioner Guled Salah Barre. This council has emerged as a voice for constitutional change, highlighting what they describe as “increasingly authoritarian leadership” in both Mogadishu and various regional administrations. It raises a poignant question: what does it truly mean to govern fairly in a society that yearns for inclusivity and justice? Through the council’s advocacy, there’s a palpable movement emerging—a consensus for a new Nigerian approach, one that encourages dialogue and broad constitutional reforms.

Evidently, Deni’s stance reflects a broader desire for democratic evolution. Despite the criticisms directed at the council, he welcomed their overarching message. This unique political landscape, where cooperation and contention coexist, signals a period ripe for transformation. In fact, it reminds us of an old African proverb that states, “If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.” This adage encapsulates the need for collective effort in addressing the complexities surrounding Somalia’s electoral and constitutional framework.

In March 2024, Northeastern State escalated this dialogue by officially suspending cooperation with the federal government. The reasons are multifaceted, rooted in concerns over centralized decision-making and a widespread apprehension regarding public ratification of the national constitution. This critical juncture raises important questions about governance structures: Are decisions made today truly reflective of the people’s needs? What happens when regions feel their voices are being overshadowed by centralized authorities?

The rift between Northeastern State and the federal government has only grown in intensity over recent months. Deni has notably rejected numerous federally backed projects, including a $5 million World Bank-funded bridge, citing them as politically driven and misaligned with Northeastern State’s priorities. This specific instance illustrates another fundamental aspect of governance: resource allocation and prioritization. Are the projects aimed at genuine development, or do they serve a different agenda? Such dilemmas not only impede progress but also fuel discontent among the populace.

Re-elected in January 2024, Deni stands as a pivotal figure in this shifting political landscape; he is the first Northeastern State president to secure a second term under its developing semi-democratic system. It’s a testament to his leadership and the support he enjoys in Northeastern State. But with power comes responsibility. Deni understands the weight of his position and the imperative to unite various political stakeholders—regardless of their differing viewpoints. “We must set aside our differences and work collectively to rescue our nation,” he emphasized, acknowledging that no group should be excluded from the discussions aimed at creating a more inclusive society.

As we navigate these choppy political waters, the question remains: how do we ensure that the voices of all Somalis are heard and respected? And how can a governance model be implemented that reflects the aspirations of a diverse populace? The answer may lie in fostering an environment where dialogue flourishes, mutual respect is paramount, and a shared vision for the future is cultivated.

Each of these questions speaks to the core of Somalia’s ongoing struggles and the profound potential for change. As citizens take note of such leadership calls, it becomes clear that the journey towards a democratic and flourishing Somalia is not just about political mandates; it’s about a collective dream for a brighter and more resilient nation.

In conclusion, while the road ahead may be fraught with challenges, the emergence of open dialogue and the commitment to inclusivity can very well lay the groundwork for a more accountable and representative governance structure. As Deni articulates, it is imperative to involve every Somali in this narrative of renewal. Who knows? The very future of Somalia might depend on it.

Edited By Ali Musa

Axadle Times International – Monitoring