In a move that might be seen as both strategic and accommodating, Somalia has taken a significant step in its democratic journey. Abdikarin, a prominent figure in Somalia’s electoral commission, recently shared, “We’ve spoken with both registered groups and those still completing their paperwork. They asked for more time, and after reviewing the request during a meeting yesterday, we agreed to add 21 days.”

With this announcement, Somalia is gearing up for a pivotal moment—local council elections scheduled for June 2025. This is not merely an isolated event; it is part of a larger ambition to embed a one-person, one-vote system within the electoral landscape. The National Independent Electoral Commission regards these elections as fundamental—a stepping stone toward an eventual nationwide shift in elections.

“Our preparations for the June elections are progressing well,” Abdikarin reassured, underscoring the commission’s unwavering dedication to adhering to the electoral timetable. But the road to reform is rarely simple.

Historically, Somalia has relied on a clan-based power-sharing model—a system deeply rooted in society but not without its critics. As the commission leans toward reform, moving away from these traditional practices, it faces considerable resistance.

Key political figures from regions like Northeastern State and Jubbaland, along with certain opposition leaders, have vocalized their skepticism. They question whether Somalia is ready for this transformational change. Concerns hover around potential security risks and the robustness of existing institutions.

Yet, despite these hurdles, the commission stands firm. It sees the expansion of democratic participation through universal suffrage as not just an exercise in democracy, but a crucial ingredient in stabilizing Somalia’s fragmented political landscape.

This effort to reform is more than administrative; it’s an emotional and cultural challenge. It’s asking communities to trust in a system that promises representation beyond familial ties, urging them to consider, “What does equality truly look like?”

In conversations with citizens, you might hear varied opinions. Some express hope, drawing parallels to other nations who have walked similar paths. A shopkeeper in Mogadishu might tell you, “Change is hard. But if others have done it, why not us?” Others, however, express concern and a longing for the familiarity of the old ways.

And therein lies the beauty of this evolving narrative—the blend of hope and skepticism. It’s a dynamic landscape of dialogue and negotiation, where promises are often weighed against past experiences.