Federal Authorities Call on Northeastern State to Retract Forces Following Fatal Dhahar Skirmishes

Las Anod (AX) — In a significant turn of events within Somalia, the federal government has addressed a pressing concern regarding the ongoing military presence in the Dhahar district of the Haylan region. Authorities have called upon Northeastern State’s regional leader, Said Abdullahi Deni, to withdraw the deployed forces, warning that their presence appears to be exacerbating local tensions rather than quelling terrorism, as intended.

This critique comes in light of an official statement released by the Ministry of Interior, expressing grave concern over the recent eruption of violence in Dhahar. Tragically, this unrest has led to the loss of life, with at least four soldiers killed and ten others injured due to clashes between Northeastern State security forces and clan militias aligned with Sanaag region politicians. In a poignant reflection of the severity of the situation, the Ministry extended heartfelt condolences to the families mourning their loved ones and offered prayers for the swift recovery of those injured.

“The deployment of forces intended to fight terrorism should not be used for internal confrontations that deepen divisions,” the Ministry’s statement read, underlining a critical point of view regarding the use of military assets. But what does it mean for a government to manage conflicts that arise from within? How can a nation foster unity when there are multiple factions vying for power and influence?

The roots of the unrest can be traced back to incidents involving Northeastern State’s Maritime Police Force (PMPF), who attempted to dismantle newly erected checkpoints in the area. This seemingly straightforward initiative spiraled into hours of fierce confrontations, forcing civilians to flee their homes in a desperate attempt to escape the violence. Local sources painted a vivid picture of the chaos, with heavy gunfire ringing through the streets—a stark reminder of the imbalance between security and safety.

As concerns escalated, traditional elders from Las Anod, many of whom have roots in Dhahar, stepped forward to voice their discontent. They denounced the military operation and accused President Deni of targeting communities sympathetic to the recently recognized SSC-Khaatumo administration. It’s a complex situation—one where loyalty and identity intermingle, leading community leaders to question the motives behind such military actions. And it begs a deeper question: to what extent should military power be employed in domestic disputes?

In light of this turmoil, the Ministry of Interior encouraged the participation of cultural elders, scholars, and intellectuals to actively mediate and bring about a swift resolution to the conflict. Their involvement isn’t just a call to action; it’s a recognition that peace-building in Somalia necessitates a multi-dimensional approach that encompasses various societal actors. “This violence undermines national unity and the broader effort to build peace in Somalia,” the Ministry articulated, reminding us of the delicate fabric that binds communities together.

At the same time, it’s worth noting that the clashes in Dhahar unfold during a pivotal moment for the region—a high-level conference in Las Anod aimed at finalizing the transition of SSC-Khaatumo from an interim authority to a recognized federal member state. This dichotomy of escalating violence amid efforts for political progress creates a multifaceted landscape, one fraught with potential but also with peril. As the peaceful dreams of state-building clash with the grim realities of conflict, one might wonder: how does a nation grow when internal fractures threaten its foundation?

Story after story from our past teach us that amidst the worst of circumstances, communities can unite to restore peace. For instance, during the Somali Civil War, it was grassroots efforts led by local elders that often brokered temporary ceasefires. Such historical parallels compel us to recognize that there is always hope for dialogue over conflicts. Peace isn’t merely the absence of violence; it’s the constructive engagement of all parties involved. In moments of despair, the courage to pursue dialogue and mutual respect can pave pathways toward healing.

As this chapter unfolds in Somalia’s history, the world watches with bated breath. The need for a balanced approach to governance, where military force is not the first resort but a last line of defense, becomes increasingly salient. In addressing the unrest in Dhahar, aspiring for peace while navigating the complex political landscape requires not just the withdrawal of troops but a broader commitment to engaging with communities and their leaders.

In conclusion, as Somalia grapples with its past and seeks to chart a course towards a unified future, the question remains: how can all sides come together, prioritizing peace and stability, while redefining the relationships that have historically divided them? The answer lies in understanding that every effort, no matter how small, contributes to the larger goal of national unity.

Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times International – Monitoring