Irish members of the European Parliament from Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael say they will oppose the EU–Mercosur trade agreement in any European Parliament vote, signaling fresh headwinds for a pact that has stalled for years over environmental and agricultural concerns.
The coordinated stance by MEPs from Ireland’s two dominant centrist parties underscores persistent resistance to the agreement, which would lower tariffs and open markets between the European Union and the Mercosur bloc of Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay. While supporters frame the deal as a strategic opening to South America and a boost for exporters, it has faced strong pushback in farm-heavy regions and from lawmakers pressing for stricter climate safeguards.
- Advertisement -
Opponents in Ireland have long argued that increased imports of beef and other agricultural products could undercut domestic producers, intensifying competition for a sector central to many rural communities. Environmental groups and skeptical lawmakers across Europe, meanwhile, have cited deforestation risks and enforcement gaps around sustainability standards, particularly in the Amazon.
The European Parliament’s position matters: the pact cannot take effect without approval by both the Parliament and EU governments. Even if the agreement advances, parts of it could also require ratification by national parliaments, adding further uncertainty to the timeline. A visible bloc of Irish MEPs voting no would add pressure on EU leaders to secure stronger guarantees before any final text is tabled.
The EU–Mercosur negotiations began in 1999 and produced a political agreement in 2019, but momentum stalled amid climate and agricultural disputes and shifting politics on both sides of the Atlantic. European officials in recent years have pursued add-on provisions intended to bolster environmental and labor protections, while governments in Mercosur countries have pressed Brussels to keep market-access commitments intact.
Farm organizations in Ireland and elsewhere have warned that the balance of the deal remains tilted against primary producers, pointing to cost gaps and stricter EU sustainability rules that they say are not matched by enforceable standards for imports. Advocates of the agreement counter that it would expand opportunities for EU industrial and services exports and deepen strategic ties at a time of global trade fragmentation.
For Ireland, the political calculus is especially sensitive. Agriculture carries outsized economic and cultural weight, and previous attempts to advance the pact have triggered demonstrations and public backlash. The decision by Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael MEPs to close ranks against the deal highlights how the center of Irish politics remains wary of Mercosur without clearer, binding protections on the environment and fair competition for farmers.
What happens next will depend on whether the European Commission moves to finalize the text and whether governments judge recent sustainability add-ons sufficient. The Parliament’s arithmetic will be closely watched: if an incoming or current majority remains unconvinced, the agreement could face another lengthy delay, or require significant revisions to pass.
For now, the Irish signal adds to the scrutiny. Any eventual vote will test how the EU balances its climate ambition and food security concerns with the push to diversify trade partners and assert economic influence abroad.
By Abdiwahab Ahmed
Axadle Times international–Monitoring.
Live
FF and FG MEPs to oppose Mercosur in EU parliament
Europe
