The Trump administration is canceling humanitarian aid programs it previously identified as lifesaving, according to an internal State Department email obtained by The Atlantic, a move that could sharply reduce assistance to vulnerable populations in parts of Africa.
The internal communication, made public by The Atlantic, says the new round of cuts will end all U.S. humanitarian funding in seven African countries. The report did not identify the countries by name in its initial coverage.
- Advertisement -
The email marks a reversal from earlier designations that treated some programs as essential to saving lives, underscoring a shift in policy priorities within the administration. Humanitarian assistance typically includes food aid, emergency medical support, shelter and basic services for people displaced by conflict or natural disasters; U.S. funding has been a major source for such programs in many countries.
Administration officials have over the past several years signaled a desire to trim foreign assistance budgets. The Trump White House repeatedly proposed reductions to State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) spending in budget requests, citing a focus on “America First” policies and calls to reduce overseas commitments.
Experts and humanitarian organizations say sudden cuts in U.S. funding can have immediate humanitarian consequences. Many relief operations rely on predictable donor support to purchase food, maintain clinics and keep supply chains running. Without replacement funding from other donors, aid groups may be forced to scale back operations or close programs.
The implications extend beyond immediate service delivery. Ending U.S. humanitarian assistance in entire countries can strain regional stability, increase displacement flows and shift responsibility to local systems that may lack capacity. Donor coordination and U.N. appeals often depend on major bilateral backers such as the United States to underwrite large portions of emergency response.
The Atlantic obtained the internal State Department email that outlines the cuts. The administration has not, in the material reviewed by that outlet, provided public detail explaining the rationale for removing previously designated lifesaving funds.
U.S. humanitarian aid has long been a mixture of bilateral contributions and multilateral funding routed through U.N. agencies and nongovernmental organizations. How other donors and implementing partners respond to the newly outlined reductions will help determine the scale of impact on people in the affected countries.
The reported decision highlights a broader debate about the role of U.S. foreign assistance in crises around the world and raises immediate questions about how affected programs will be sustained in the weeks and months ahead.
By News-room Axadle Times international–Monitoring.
