On June 26, 2025, during a press conference in Nairobi, Kipchumba Murkomen, Kenya’s Cabinet Secretary for the Ministry of Interior and National Administration, made headlines with his stark remarks about ongoing protests in the country. Labeling these demonstrations as acts of “terrorism” and an attempted coup, he painted a grim picture of a nation at the brink. The echoes of his words reverberated not just through the room but across the very fabric of Kenyan society, raising urgent questions about governance, rights, and dissent.
- Advertisement -
It was not just rhetoric that day; emotions ran high as Murkomen reported that at least ten lives had been tragically lost during the unrest. Activists, however, pointed to reports from Amnesty Kenya, which stated that the toll was at least sixteen, all of whom had died from gunshot wounds, allegedly inflicted by the police. As smoke billowed from charred buildings across central Nairobi, the raw aftermath of these confrontations became painfully clear, leaving many shopkeepers rushing to salvage what they could from the wreckage of their livelihoods.
The protests, largely driven by the youth—often referred to as “Gen Z” in Kenya—began as peaceful gatherings intended to commemorate the anniversary of similar anti-government protests that had occurred a year ago. Organic in their inception, they took on a deeper resonance following the recent death of a young blogger, Albert Ojwang, who had died in police custody, stirring fresh waves of anger and desire for justice among Kenyans.
During his address, Murkomen asserted that the protesters were attempting to enact “regime change.” As tensions escalated, law enforcement was compelled to take measures—some might argue drastic ones—to suppress the crowds approaching significant political landmarks like the parliament and State House, the president’s official residence. “Criminal anarchists,” he described them, warning of a wave of violence, looting, and chaos that threatened the order of the nation.
Among those challenging the narrative spun by the government was Boniface Mwangi, a prominent figure within the protest movement. He remarked to Reuters, “The branding of yesterday’s protests as a coup is the government’s attempt to shift attention from the real issue.” This statement echoes a broader sentiment that the frustrations tied to socioeconomic problems are being overshadowed by government rhetoric.
It’s worth pausing to contemplate: what leads a government to suppress dissent so forcefully? Are these protests merely a guise for deeper unrest, or are they a legitimate outcry for change? Ibrahim Hamisi, owner of one of the burnt-out establishments, poignantly suggested that both the government and Gen Z needed to sit down for a dialogue—an opportunity for genuine communication. “Look: everything they burnt. So please government, try talking to the Gen Z,” he implored. His words underscore the unresolved tensions debating who holds the responsibility for the state’s direction and its citizens’ welfare.
Meanwhile, Josephine Apondi, a shopkeeper attempting to recover from the mayhem, reported looting that stripped her of nearly two million Kenyan Shillings (roughly $15,500) worth of electronics. Her story is a stark reminder that the consequences of these demonstrations extend far beyond political affiliations; they impact the daily lives of ordinary Kenyans. The emotional aftermath of such loss cannot be overstated; how do you rebuild not just a business, but faith in a system that seems to overlook your plight?
The protests on that fateful Wednesday were originally convened to reflect on anti-tax movements from the previous year, which had resulted in over sixty fatalities. Yet they crescendoed into a larger dialogue about police brutality, justice, and accountability—specifically in light of Ojwang’s death. With prosecutors approving murder charges against six individuals, including three police officers, the stakes are even higher. All six have pleaded not guilty, leaving the public questioning whether true justice will ever be served. The absence of comment from Deputy National Police Chief Eliud Lagat, who sparked the controversy, further complicates the public’s response and perception.
As events unfold, the need for understanding—human connection—is paramount. In a nation rich in culture and resilience, where economic challenges intertwine with aspirations for freedom, it is vital we converse. Dialogue should not mere rhetoric; it should bridge gaps, address grievances, and bring hope.
In the midst of disruption, one might ponder: Can a nation emerge stronger from such turbulence? Only time will tell as the heartbeats of the people resonate louder than the echoes of unrest.
Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times International – Monitoring.
