Namibia’s plan to revive a flag carrier revives familiar risks — and questions
The government of Namibia has moved from intention to action in its plan to relaunch a national airline, confirming a new state-owned entity — Namibia Air Pty Limited — and the appointment of an interim board. Works and transport minister Veikko Nekundi says market analysis, traffic forecasting and a business model are under way, and that the carrier could be operational in the next financial year. Opposition parties have urged caution, warning that Namibians could again pick up the tab if lessons from Air Namibia’s collapse are ignored.
- Advertisement -
Why a national airline still appeals
For many governments, a flag carrier is more than a transport business; it is a symbol of sovereignty, a tool for economic development, and a means to stimulate tourism and trade. In Namibia’s case — a country reliant on high-value tourism, mining and long-haul business connections — leaders see an airline as a way to control connectivity, foster inbound travel and capture a slice of aviation’s ancillary revenues.
That political logic resonates across Africa. State-linked airlines can project national pride and, when well run, become regional hubs and profit centers. Ethiopian Airlines is often cited as a model of a successful state-owned carrier that has used strategic management, regional network growth and diversified revenue streams to thrive.
Why caution is warranted
But the history of flag carriers in Africa is littered with expensive failures. Air Namibia, whose operations were suspended and assets liquidated in 2020 amid mounting losses and debt, remains a recent and raw example for Namibian voters and lawmakers. The core dangers are familiar: persistent operating deficits, political interference in route and fleet decisions, underpriced fares to serve short-term political goals, weak corporate governance, and the high fixed costs of aircraft and trained personnel.
Starting an airline is capital intensive. Beyond acquisition or leasing of aircraft, a viable carrier must secure trained crews, maintenance capability, insurance and contingency cash for fuel price shocks and economic downturns. Bilateral air service agreements that allow international routes can take years to negotiate or expand. All of these are areas where underestimation of costs and timelines has sunk governments before.
Markets are more competitive than they look
Minister Nekundi has acknowledged the competitiveness of the African aviation market — and he must mean more than passenger numbers. In the last decade, African skies have seen the expansion of commercially focused carriers such as Ethiopian, Turkish and Gulf-based airlines that use Africa as a node in global networks. Regional players like RwandAir and Kenya Airways also compete aggressively for traffic with route networks, partnerships and freighter services that capture both passengers and cargo.
For a small country, the question is whether a new carrier can reach the necessary scale and commercial partnerships to be profitable. Targeting niche markets — coded as tourism packages to high-end lodges, or specialist cargo services — can work, but those strategies require careful, evidence-based planning and often private-sector partners.
What a credible restart would require
If the aim is to avoid repeating past mistakes, several priorities should shape the government’s approach:
- Transparent financing and a realistic capitalization plan: Will the airline depend on recurrent subsidies? If so, for how long? Clear limits — and scenarios identifying when public support must be phased out — should be set in law.
- Independent, professional governance: Appointing a board with aviation experience and insulating operational decisions from political patronage is essential. Performance targets and independent audits should be published.
- Partnerships and alliances: Codeshares, interline agreements and strategic equity partners can provide feed, scale and technical expertise that a start-up carrier lacks.
- Fleet and sustainability strategy: Choosing the right aircraft type, balancing capital costs against fuel efficiency and maintenance demands, and planning for decarbonization pressures will affect long-term viability.
- Market realism: Detailed, peer-reviewed traffic forecasting that accounts for seasonality, tourism trends and competition is critical before route launches and aircraft leases are signed.
Alternatives to a wholly state-owned carrier
Given the risks, alternatives deserve serious consideration. Public-private partnerships, minority equity stakes by experienced airline investors, or a lean national aviation platform that focuses on slots, ground services and marketing — leaving flying to contracted operators — can deliver connectivity goals with lower fiscal exposure. Namibia could also intensify incentives for foreign carriers to increase flights into Hosea Kutako and Walvis Bay, or pursue open-sky arrangements to boost competition.
Questions the government must answer
Beyond the optimistic timetable for operations next financial year lie basic accountability questions voters and legislators should press on: What is the startup capital and who guarantees it? What is the break-even horizon for passenger and cargo operations? Why opt for a fully state-owned model rather than one with private strategic partners? How will lessons from Air Namibia’s governance failures be institutionalized to prevent repetition?
Answering these requires more than a market study; it demands a public-facing plan with clear metrics, parliamentary oversight and enforceable sunset clauses for subsidies. Without that, the political appeal of a flag carrier risks translating into another fiscal burden for taxpayers.
The new interim board and the government can still make this a constructive exercise. If the process produces a transparent, professionally governed and economically realistic airline — or a pragmatic alternative that secures connectivity without open-ended subsidies — it could mark a rare example of state ambition paired with fiscal responsibility. If not, Namibia’s next chapter in aviation may repeat a painful lesson: national sentiment is not a substitute for sound business and public financial management.
By News-room
Axadle Times international–Monitoring.
