UN Chief Reiterates Opposition to Israeli-US Gaza Aid Proposal at Baghdad Summit

In the bustling heart of New York City, the world was captivated by the profound discussions unfolding at the Arab League summit held in Baghdad on May 17, 2025. Uniting in a quest for peace, prominent figures such as Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres brought attention to pressing global issues, particularly the escalating situation in Gaza.

During his address, Guterres firmly reiterated his unwavering stance against a collaborative Israeli-American initiative designed to bypass the United Nations (UN) in delivering humanitarian aid to Gaza. His declaration came in response to recent satellite images depicting the construction of new aid distribution centers within the beleaguered enclave. As Guterres stood before an audience steeped in the urgency of his message, one could sense the palpable tension in the air. Could this issue be the tipping point for regional stability?

Addressing the gathered nations, Guterres opened his speech with commendation for Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit, emphasizing a desire to further strengthen the UN’s partnership with the League. This spirit of collaboration resounded deeply in lines like, “We cannot afford to watch the two-state solution disappear before our eyes.” Here lies a poignant reminder of our collective responsibility to work towards peace and coexistence.

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Al-Sudani’s remarks echoed powerfully in the hall: “This genocide in Gaza has reached a level of ugliness unparalleled in all conflicts in history.” Such a stark assertion paints a vivid picture of the hardships experienced by civilians caught in the crossfire. It prompts essential questions: How can we transform outrage into action? What steps can nations take to address these humanitarian crises beyond mere rhetoric?

Guterres skillfully steered the conversation beyond Gaza, spotlighting the situations in the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, and Libya. He expressed alarm regarding Israel’s plans to escalate ground operations, stressing the urgent need for a ceasefire and unrestricted access for humanitarian aid. Since March, Israel has instituted a complete blockade of aid to Gaza, aiming to intensify pressure on Hamas. This reality showcases the complex interplay between military strategy and humanitarian needs— a painful paradox that challenges our moral compass.

In discussing Israel’s proposal to involve third parties in aid delivery, Guterres was adamant, stating, “The UN will not participate in any so-called aid operation that does not adhere to international law and the humanitarian principles of humanity, impartiality, independence, and neutrality.” His resolute words invite us to reflect deeply: What does true humanitarian assistance look like in a world riddled with power struggles?

Turning attention to the West Bank, Guterres condemned the illegal annexation and settlement activities, articulating clearly: “Annexation is illegal. Settlements are illegal.” These affirmations, grounded in international law, highlight the importance of accountability. Can adherence to legality become the bedrock upon which we build a sustainable peace?

Looking ahead, Guterres highlighted an upcoming high-level conference on the Palestinian issue, co-hosted by Saudi Arabia and France, viewing it as “an important opportunity.” The air was thick with hope and apprehension as he urged, “The world and the region—most importantly, the people of Palestine and Israel—cannot afford to witness further deterioration.” For many, this underscores a burning desire for resolution amid despair.

On the topic of Lebanon, Guterres acknowledged the commitment of Lebanese officials to establish a state monopoly over weapons. This development is crucial as the UN peacekeeping force, UNIFIL, collaborates with the Lebanese military to dismantle arms caches belonging to Hezbollah in the southern region. Here too, we find ourselves at a crossroads: Will the commitment lead to tangible disarmament, or is this another fleeting moment in a long history of unrest?

Guterres’s reflections on Syria emphasized the necessity for a political process anchored in the principles of Security Council resolution 2254. “This process must safeguard the rights and participation of all Syrians, regardless of ethnicity and religion,” he emphasized, invoking a sense of collective responsibility. How can we ensure that all voices, especially the most marginalized, are heard in the journey towards peace?

Of note was Guterres’s welcoming of the recent Houthi-US ceasefire mediated by Oman, urging, “The trajectory of violence must cease as we work for a negotiated Yemeni-led political settlement.” Such moments of optimism remind us that diplomacy, though often fraught with obstacles, can yield fruits of peace.

Reflecting on the situation in Sudan, he expressed gratitude to both the Arab League and the African Union for their robust coordination efforts. As Guterres articulated his vision for Libya, he said, “We are engaging with national and international actors to end confrontations, ensure institutional independence, and set the course for long-term stability.” This imperative to prioritize the Libyan people’s needs echoes significantly in a world yearning for justice and prosperity.

In summarizing his address, Guterres urged, “Despite the enormous challenges, let us draw lessons and hope from Baghdad. Working in unity and solidarity, we can help resolve conflicts and build a future of peace and prosperity.” His final words lingered in the air, igniting a soft spark of hope among the attendees—a collective desire for a world imbued with collaboration rather than strife.

“That is the shared goal of the Arab League and the UN, and I look forward to continuing to deepen our partnership together.” This sentiment encapsulates the essence of international cooperation, suggesting that the path to peace is a shared endeavor.

Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times International – Monitoring.