Somalia and Egypt Edge Closer on Defense — With the Nile Dispute in the Background
MOGADISHU — Around a long wooden table inside Somalia’s Ministry of Defense, a quiet but consequential conversation unfolded this week. Somalia’s deputy defense minister and senior generals received Egypt’s defense attaché, Col. Ahmed Fathi Abdelsatar Al-Husseini, to discuss tighter military cooperation: more joint training, deeper coordination, and, according to Somali officials, a possible Egyptian role within the African Union’s security architecture in Somalia.
- Advertisement -
On its face, it was a routine meeting between two governments that have grown friendlier over the past year. But in the Horn of Africa, routine is rarely just routine. The timing and subtext matter. As Egypt and Ethiopia remain locked in a high-stakes dispute over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) on the Nile, even a training mission can become a signal, and even a courtesy call can be read as leverage.
Context: A Mission in Transition, a Region on Edge
The African Union’s peace operation in Somalia — known for years as AMISOM and reconfigured as the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia (ATMIS) in 2022 — is steadily drawing down. The goal is to hand full security responsibility to Somali forces while keeping al-Shabaab on the back foot. Uganda, Burundi, Djibouti, Kenya and Ethiopia have provided troops. Egypt has not, historically, been a contributor on the ground, though Cairo has offered training, equipment and political support to various partners in the region.
Any suggestion that Egypt could send personnel into Somalia, even in support roles or under an AU umbrella, will be scrutinized in Addis Ababa. Ethiopian soldiers serve in ATMIS and through separate bilateral deployments inside Somalia; they are essential to the anti–al-Shabaab fight and sensitive to any shift that could tilt regional balances. In a mission built on fragile cooperation, the optics of Egyptian uniforms appearing in Mogadishu would matter as much as the mandate.
There is another layer: Somalia’s relations with Ethiopia have soured since the start of 2024, when Addis Ababa signed a memorandum of understanding with North Western State of Somalia — the self-declared republic in the north — that envisions Ethiopian access to the Gulf of Aden coast. Mogadishu called it an assault on Somalia’s sovereignty. Since then, Somalia has doubled down on alliances. It sealed a sweeping maritime defense pact with Turkey, reinforced ties with Eritrea and the Gulf, and welcomed a louder voice from Egypt.
Cairo’s Calculus
Egypt’s interests in the Horn stretch far beyond Mogadishu. The Nile is Egypt’s lifeline; more than 95 percent of Egyptians live within a sliver of its banks, and the river supplies the vast majority of the country’s fresh water. Ethiopia’s decision to build and fill the massive GERD on the Blue Nile has been a defining strategic challenge for Cairo. President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has famously described Egypt’s access to the river as a “red line,” and successive rounds of talks — mediated by the African Union, the United States and others — have failed to produce a binding agreement on filling and operating the dam.
That dispute colors perceptions of almost everything Egypt does in the Horn. When Cairo offers to train Somali soldiers, provides equipment, or pledges to bolster the AU mission, critics in Ethiopia see encirclement. Egyptian officials say the opposite: that their engagement is aimed at stabilizing Somalia, securing sea lines to the Suez Canal, and countering extremist groups that threaten everyone in the region. Both of those statements can be true at once.
There is a maritime logic as well. The Red Sea and Gulf of Aden have become riskier since the Gaza war, with attacks on shipping reverberating up to the Suez Canal — a pillar of Egypt’s economy. A steadier Somalia and friendlier ports along the Gulf of Aden align with Egypt’s security and economic interests. In that light, military cooperation looks less like pressure on Addis and more like prudent perimeter defense.
Mogadishu’s Balancing Act
For Somalia, the immediate stakes are domestic: beating back al-Shabaab, professionalizing the army, and managing a delicate security transition as ATMIS draws down. The government has leaned on a mosaic of partners — Turkey runs the country’s largest overseas training base in Mogadishu, Qatar and the UAE provide support, Eritrea has trained battalions of Somali troops, and the United States and European states offer counterterror and capacity-building assistance.
Inviting Egyptian trainers or expanding defense ties with Cairo fits that pattern. It also carries political symbolism: a message to Ethiopia that Somalia is not isolated, and a reminder that Horn politics do not revolve solely around Addis Ababa. The challenge for Mogadishu is to amplify support without becoming a proxy arena for a far larger quarrel on the Nile. Every additional logo on a Somali uniform patch can be both an asset and a risk.
Addis Ababa’s Read
From Ethiopia’s vantage point, a visible Egyptian defense footprint in Somalia would be provocative, even if limited to training or advisory roles. Ethiopia has its own domestic security concerns, a fraught postwar environment, and high political investment in the GERD as a symbol of national pride and development. The idea that Cairo might gain even nominal military access in a neighboring country would reinforce suspicions that the Nile dispute is spilling into the Horn’s security arrangements.
The irony is that Ethiopian forces remain an essential pillar of Somalia’s security — a reminder of how intertwined these files are. If relations continue to deteriorate, the risk grows that cooperation in the field could fray at the edges, making a tough mission tougher. The AU has kept a careful balance for years; maintaining that balance as ATMIS winds down will require deft diplomacy from all sides.
What to Watch Next
1) Will the AU mission’s mandate evolve?
Any new troop contributor or reconfiguration would need AU and UN approvals. With ATMIS slated to complete its transition and Somalia assuming more responsibility, a surge of new foreign forces appears unlikely. Expect more training, intelligence, and equipment support rather than big new deployments.
2) Can GERD talks avoid another stalemate?
Technical issues are tangled with national identity on both sides. A credible, AU-led framework on dam operations — with guarantees for downstream flows and space for Ethiopian development — remains the best off-ramp. Without it, suspicion will seep into every regional dossier, including Somalia.
3) How does Red Sea security shape choices?
Shipping disruptions and insurance spikes ripple through budgets from Mogadishu to Cairo. That pressure incentivizes cooperation on maritime security, even among rivals. Watch for practical coordination at sea, even as arguments on the Nile persist.
4) Somalia’s security trajectory
If Somali forces can hold and expand territory reclaimed from al-Shabaab, the space for geopolitical jostling shrinks. If they struggle, external patrons — and their agendas — tend to fill the vacuum.
The Human Measure
In Mogadishu’s markets, the price of sugar and fuel — not diplomatic communiqués — tells people whether the neighborhood is getting safer. In river-fed villages in Egypt and Ethiopia, farmers scan the skies and the Nile’s current, wondering if there will be enough water for the season ahead. The Horn’s geopolitics are grand; the stakes are intimate.
Somalia and Egypt say their new cooperation is about training soldiers and stabilizing a country still scarred by war. Ethiopia hears something else: the distant rumble of the Nile dispute coming closer to its borders. Both interpretations are understandable. The question for regional leaders is whether they can keep those narratives from colliding — and let the battle against al-Shabaab, and the quest for a fair settlement on the Nile, proceed without turning Somalia into another front.
In a region where the same waters bind and divide, restraint may be the hardest form of strength. It’s also the one ordinary people most need.
By Ali Musa
Axadle Times international–Monitoring.
