Garowe (AX) – In a remarkable display of political fervor, Guuleed Salah Barre, the former chairman of the Northeastern State Electoral Commission, has launched a pointed critique against Northeastern State President Said Abdullahi Deni. During a press conference in Garowe on Saturday, Guuleed accused the president of engaging mercenary firms in activities deemed illegal, particularly regarding the extraction of the region’s natural resources.
- Advertisement -
“You are now aware that Northeastern State’s natural resources are being illegally extracted,” Guuleed stated emphatically, warning that mercenary companies are, in essence, “plundering” the wealth of the region. His passionate words resonated deeply, hinting at a growing sense of urgency and alarm among the local populace. The areas of Sanaag and Bari, rich in resources, are, according to him, being exploited without the consent or benefit of the public. This assertion raises a crucial question: How can regional wealth be safeguarded when those at the helm seem to prioritize profit over the well-being of their people?
Indeed, Guuleed’s allegations take on a somber tone when considering the implications. “These resources belong to the people of Northeastern State,” he argued, painting a picture of a grassroots fight against exploitation. What does it mean for a community when its resources are stripped away? This isn’t just about economics; it’s about identity, legacy, and future prospects.
Guuleed further mentioned that he was once a contender in the Northeastern State presidential election against President Deni, a victory that now seems to him like a distant memory. He accused Deni of prioritizing a model of governance that resembles a familial enterprise rather than a democratic institution. “Hopes for reform under his new term have completely collapsed,” Guuleed lamented. Such stark words bring to light a poignant reality; the sense of lost opportunity looms large over Northeastern State.
Moreover, Guuleed criticized Deni’s strategy of reconnecting Northeastern State’s economy with that of Mogadishu, arguing that this initiative has led to dire economic consequences. He pointed to increasing unemployment rates and the alarming trend of youth migration as direct results of policies that, in his view, are failing. “Northeastern State’s economy is being ruined, and its future is being mortgaged,” he warned, invoking a sense of urgency that resonates with many who feel marginalized in their own land.
What happens when the dreams and aspirations of a generation are eclipsed by political maneuvering? As Guuleed elaborated on his perspective, it’s evident that this is not just a political narrative; it embodies the struggle of young people seeking opportunity and stability in a challenging landscape. It raises another pressing question: Is there a path forward that can bridge the divide between governance and the community’s needs?
Further emphasizing the gravity of the situation, Guuleed described the ongoing standoff between Northeastern State and the Federal Government as more than just political differences. “This is a personal conflict,” he declared, attributing Northeastern State’s setbacks in federal political negotiations to Deni’s leadership. His remarks suggest that the implications of such misalignments are felt by the ordinary citizens, who endure the fallout from what he perceives as Deni’s failures.
Interestingly, the Northeastern State presidency has yet to respond to these scathing allegations, leaving many to speculate about the administration’s next steps. Will the silence be viewed as an admission of guilt, or is it a calculated decision to await a more favorable moment to counter these claims?
Guuleed’s statements mirror a rising tide of internal dissent within Northeastern State, reflective of broader concerns surrounding governance, relations with the federal structure, and the management of precious resources. As tensions build between Deni’s administration and various opposition figures, a chorus is emerging, calling not just for accountability, but for a future characterized by transparency and public engagement. This situation prompts a final reflection: What kind of governance do people envision for Northeastern State, and how can they work together to realize that vision?
In closing, it is imperative for both leaders and citizens alike to engage in meaningful dialogue about the path forward. A healthy democracy thrives on open communication and the ability to course-correct when necessary. Only then can the true potential of Northeastern State’s resources, and its people, be harnessed for the greater good.
Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times International – Monitoring.
