In a significant turning point for Somalia’s democracy, voter registration has officially commenced in the capital city, marking a pivotal moment in the nation’s long-standing journey towards direct elections. This initiative, coupled with the establishment of electoral frameworks and legislation, is more than just procedural; it symbolizes an essential shift away from decades of clan-based voting systems. Historically, lawmakers were not elected directly by the people but rather selected through indirect consensus, perpetuating a cycle of division and mistrust.
- Advertisement -
Recently, 103 members of Somalia’s bicameral Federal Parliament made headlines by issuing a powerful joint statement demanding the resignation of President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud. The accusations against him are grave: lawmakers contend that he has abandoned his constitutional responsibilities, dismantled the National Consultative Council (NCC), and interfered in the functioning of federal member states like Northeastern State and Jubbaland. Furthermore, they allege that state resources have been misappropriated to advance a partisan agenda. The dissatisfaction is palpable, as these officials have expressed their frustration over the president’s failure to follow through on a pledge made on March 29 to convene a national dialogue. Instead, they claim his administration is fostering division at a time when national unity is crucial.
In a sharp retort, President Mohamud criticized certain opposition leaders who voiced doubts about the military’s capacity to combat Al-Shabaab, posing an unsettling question: “A politician who says a battalion can’t fight—what is he really saying? Is he defending Al-Shabaab? Is he trying to alarm the public that Mogadishu will fall?” His rhetorical inquiries reflect a deep concern that undermining public faith in the armed forces could have dire repercussions for national security.
Moreover, the president cautioned against reverting to the indirect electoral system. “Last time, members of parliament were chosen in two hours and stuffed into people’s pockets,” he recounted, highlighting the systemic failures that plagued past elections. “Even those who picked them didn’t benefit. Why would we do that again? If we do, this time it may cost lives.” His plea resonates with a populace weary of political exploitation and eager for genuine representation.
This week also saw the official launch of the Joint Somali Party (JSP) in Mogadishu, with President Hassan Sheikh at its helm as chairman and presidential candidate. The founding of this party has stirred considerable controversy. Critics, including Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre and Deputy Prime Minister Salah Jama—who serve as vice chairpersons—argue that this blurs the lines between state functions and political maneuvering. The creation of the JSP raises troubling questions: Is it fair for public officials to intertwine state resources with party agendas? Are state institutions being reoriented for political gain in advance of a much-anticipated transition to universal suffrage?
Northeastern State President Said Abdullahi Deni did not hold back in his critique, labeling the JSP a “rebranded extension” of the outdated 4.5 clan-based power-sharing system, cautioning that it could undermine the federal fabric of the nation. He accuses the federal government of manipulating the democratic reform agenda while consolidating power in Mogadishu, further deepening the divides within Somali politics.
Sixteen influential Somali political figures, including prominent names like former Presidents Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo and Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, joined forces to voice their concerns in a separate statement. They lamented the president’s politicization of the NCC, his failure to maintain neutrality, and the consequent worsening of political fragmentation—a sentiment echoed by many who fear that the tumultuous landscape could lead to further instability. “The country is facing an unprecedented political crisis,” they stated, urging for an approach that prioritizes unity over partisanship.
Former President Farmaajo took the critique further, asserting that President Mohamud has breached several provisions of Somalia’s provisional constitution, particularly those safeguarding institutional neutrality and federal autonomy. He raised alarms regarding the use of state resources—including media and national security forces—to advance personal political interests, which he believes undermines trust and democracy.
Amidst this whirlwind of political tension, President Mohamud maintains that finalizing the country’s provisional constitution is essential for reinforcing national unity and democratic governance. He expressed appreciation for the constitutional committees currently at work, emphasizing that finalizing this document could provide a resilient framework for Somalia’s future.
Despite the chorus of criticism, the federal government is steadfast in its commitment to achieving universal suffrage as part of a broader reform agenda. However, the road ahead is fraught with challenges. Political friction permeates every layer of governance, and the persistent threat of Al-Shabaab, which continues to launch deadly attacks across the nation, looms large over the future of Somalia.
As we reflect on these critical developments, one cannot help but wonder: What will it take for Somalia to transcend its limitations and forge a path towards a more democratic and stable future? The answer may lie in healing the deep fractures that have long divided the nation, uniting all stakeholders in a collective pursuit of peace and progress.
Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times International – Monitoring.
