In a recent discussion with NBC, US President Donald Trump expressed his “anger” towards Russian President Vladimir Putin, reflecting a notable shift in tone as efforts intensify to bring an end to the ongoing war in Ukraine. As Trump conveyed his frustrations, he emphasized the serious implications of Putin’s remarks about Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s leadership, a topic Trump himself has also commented on.
Kristen Welker from NBC shared insights from her conversation with Trump on her show ‘Meet The Press’, highlighting the president’s displeasure with Putin’s stance. Trump stated, “If Russia and I are unable to make a deal on stopping the bloodshed in Ukraine, and if I think it was Russia’s fault, then I would impose secondary tariffs on all oil coming out of Russia.”
Challenges to Peace Initiatives
Despite Trump’s push for a swift resolution to the war, which has now lasted over three years, his administration has struggled to achieve a significant breakthrough. Recently, Putin dismissed a proposal for a 30-day ceasefire suggested by the US and Ukraine and even proposed Zelensky’s removal as part of the peace negotiations.
Ukraine has accused Russia of stalling negotiations with no real intention of ceasing hostilities, as evidenced by continued attacks, such as the recent strike on the northeastern city of Kharkiv. Trump remarked during his NBC appearance that while he has a “very good relationship” with Putin, his anger dissipates quickly “if he does the right thing.”
Explaining his potential tariffs, Trump added, “If you buy oil from Russia, you can’t do business in the United States,” suggesting a 25% tariff on Russian oil purchases without providing extensive details. His stance implies that similar actions could extend to countries like China and India, which heavily rely on Russian oil, particularly as India has recently become the largest importer of Russian crude.
Suggesting a Ceasefire Deadline
Trump’s comments came after a day spent with Finnish President Alexander Stubb, who asserted the necessity of establishing a clear deadline for a ceasefire—proposing April 20 as a symbolic date, marking three months since Trump assumed office.
Meanwhile, US officials are encouraging Ukraine to consider an agreement concerning critical minerals, which suggests a significant claim on Ukraine’s natural resource profits. Zelensky has indicated that he needs time for his legal team to analyze the proposal before releasing further comments.
Former Commerce Department official William Reinsch noted that Trump’s erratic announcements regarding tariffs raise numerous questions about implementation, particularly how enforcement would identify those nations purchasing Russian oil.
Calls for Pressure on Russia
The evolving dynamics between the US and Russia amidst Trump’s renewed presidency have complicated matters on the battlefield, enabling Russia to gain ground as it continues its faltering invasion. With Putin questioning Zelensky’s legitimacy—an argument echoed by others—Ukraine finds itself in a precarious position, as domestic law prohibits elections during significant military conflicts.
Reflecting on the situation, Zelensky remarked, “For too long now, America’s proposal for an unconditional ceasefire has been on the table without an adequate response from Russia.” He expressed optimism that a ceasefire could already be in place “if there was real pressure on Russia,” thanking those nations that have intensified sanctions on the Kremlin.
Both Moscow and Kyiv have shown a willingness to explore a truce in the Black Sea area, following discussions with US officials. However, Russia has clarified that such agreements would only take effect after Ukraine’s allies agree to lift specific sanctions.
As the situation develops, many observers await more definitive actions and statements that may shape the future of these critical negotiations.
Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times International – Monitoring.
