Sudanese PM Calls on UN to Designate RSF as ‘Terrorist Group’
Sudan on the Brink: A Call for Global Intervention
In a poignant address this Thursday at the 80th session of the U.N. General Assembly in New York, Sudanese Prime Minister Kamil Idris delivered a stark message to the international community. With a voice echoing the urgency of his nation’s plight, Idris implored the world to label the Rapid Support Forces, or RSF, as a “terrorist militia.” His plea comes amid a brutal civil war that has entangled Sudan since April 2023, leaving a trail of devastation and displacement in its wake.
- Advertisement -
A Nation in Crisis
“The Sudanese people,” Idris declared with palpable frustration, “have faced existential threats and dangers because of the RSF, which has adopted a policy of terrorizing civilians.” Since the conflict’s onset, clashes between Sudan’s regular army and the RSF have not only decimated communities but also shredded any semblance of normalcy for millions.
Idris passionately called for an immediate cessation of the flow of weapons and mercenaries into Sudan—a plea steeped in desperation as the nation grapples with what he described as “enormous challenges and risks” that shake the very foundation of the U.N. Charter and threaten regional and global stability. His words were not just a reflection of the anarchy within Sudan’s borders but a cautionary tale warning of the wider implications.
El-Fasher: A Humanitarian Hub Under Siege
One of the epicenters of this unfolding tragedy is the city of El-Fasher. Once a cornerstone of humanitarian outreach in Darfur, El-Fasher is now ensnared in a violent siege. Since May 2024, the city has been engulfed in fierce fighting between the army and RSF, igniting fears over the wellbeing of the region’s already vulnerable populations.
Idris’s appeal for lifting the siege aligns with U.N. Security Council resolutions, yet the international reaction has been muted. Hospitals, mosques, and displacement camps have not been spared, eliciting condemnation from Idris as he implored the global community to break its silence.
Global Reflections and A Broader Crisis
The crisis in Sudan is not an isolated event. Idris’s speech took a broader turn as he connected Sudan’s turmoil to wider geopolitical tensions. He pointed out the escalating violence in the Gaza Strip, stressing that lasting regional peace hinges on resolving the Palestinian issue. “There can be no stability or security,” he warned, “without a comprehensive and lasting solution.”
In an unexpected but provocative observation, Idris condemned a recent Israeli attack on Hamas leadership in Doha, Qatar, decrying it as yet another threat to international peace. His words draw a poignant connection between localized conflicts and global stability, questioning how these intertwined issues shape the geopolitical landscape and what role global powers should play.
The Human Side of Conflict
In the shadow of political rhetoric lies the undeniable human cost. According to U.N. data, the civil war in Sudan has resulted in thousands of deaths and driven millions from their homes, many into sprawling refugee camps in dire conditions. These numbers, while staggering, only begin to convey the depth of suffering endured by everyday Sudanese people.
Stories filter through of families divided, children uprooted, and lives stunted by the constant thrum of warfare. The RSF’s alleged acts of terror against civilians exacerbate these fears, leaving a populace wondering what future awaits them.
A Call to Action
As tensions simmer globally, the challenges posed by Sudan’s crisis call for a multifaceted approach from the international community. The question remains whether nations will heed Idris’s call, or if his plea will echo in the halls of the U.N. without tangible outcome.
Prime Minister Idris has set the stage for a renewed dialogue on what active steps can be taken—recognizing RSF as a “terrorist militia” is just the beginning. What lies ahead is the complex task of rebuilding a fractured nation, a process that will require collaborative effort, not only within the corridors of power but on the ground with those whose lives hang in the balance.
In the end, as observers of this tumultuous chapter, we must ask ourselves: How can the world better support nations in crisis, and what roles do empathy and action play in shaping a more stable global future?
With each day marked by humanitarian need and diplomatic urgency, Sudan stands as a testament to the challenges of our times—a call to action for those equipped to respond.
By Ali Musa
Axadle Times international–Monitoring.