The Rise of Digital Propaganda in Sudan’s Conflict
Amid the brutal power struggle between Sudan’s military factions, social media has become a battleground of misinformation. With rampant fake news and manipulative narratives, trust in reliable information has eroded.
- Advertisement -
- Both sides exploit social media to spread misleading information.
- False claims on social media deepen societal divisions.
- Traditional media suppression fuels disinformation.
The Stakes of Sudan’s Humanitarian Crisis
The conflict between army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan Daglo has plunged Sudan into a humanitarian disaster. With mass displacement and growing hunger, the crisis shows no sign of abating.
- Tens of thousands have died and millions are displaced.
- The conflict is labeled one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises.
- Famine conditions exacerbate the human suffering.
The Role of Propaganda in Warfare
Both military factions leverage online platforms to disseminate propaganda. This strategic use of misinformation aims to deceive and rally support, while discrediting opponents.
- Disinformation circulates through images, videos, and social media posts.
- Both sides accuse each other of atrocities to sway public opinion.
- Traditional press outlets are largely silenced, amplifying online voices.
The Historical Context of Misinformation
The use of media manipulation is not new in Sudan. Techniques dating back to the early 2010s have been revived, tapping into lessons from the Arab Spring to suppress dissent and control narratives.
- Past regimes used digital tactics to control public perception.
- The military and RSF have intensified these strategies.
- Substantial resources are devoted to media operations.
The “Liar’s Dividend” and Its Consequences
Constant denials and counterclaims have cultivated the “liar’s dividend.” This tactic enables each faction to distract, deny accountability, and further polarize the populace.
- Accusations are met with counterclaims, creating confusion.
- Disinformation incites violence and deepens regional divides.
- The lack of reliable internet exacerbates the reliance on rumors.
International Dynamics and Implications
The involvement of external parties such as the UAE in alleged media campaigns adds an international dimension. The geopolitical stakes influence both propaganda and on-the-ground realities.
- Accusations of foreign involvement amplify tension.
- Media narratives reflect broader regional power plays.
- International perceptions can shift as misinformation spreads.
By Ali Musa
Axadle Times international–Monitoring.
