Agenda Topics for the National Dialogue Commission in the Somali Region
A Glimpse of the National Dialogue Commission Gathering in Ethiopia’s Somali Region (Photo: public domain)
- Advertisement -
On Sunday, the National Dialogue Commission embarked on a pivotal gathering in Ethiopia’s Somali region, as detailed by BBC Amharic. A myriad of issues came under the spotlight during this session—everything from the structural composition of the government and possible constitutional revisions to the symbolism of the country’s flag. Language officialdom and the interpretation of Ethiopia’s rich history were also up for debate. Another significant topic was the contentious boundary disputes.
This significant meeting, hosted within Jijiga University’s grand hall, drew an eclectic mix of attendees. Delegates from political factions, regional authorities, and influential community members mingled with representatives from various associations and stakeholders. Approximately 1,200 individuals lent their voices to the session, making it truly representative.
A prevailing sentiment amongst those assembled, as shared by BBC Amharic, was a demand for “genuine federalism.” The core focus revolved around the governance and configuration of Ethiopia’s federal regions. Critiques emerged, spotlighting past issues and interventions in implementing federalism. Many attendees seemed to agree that previous federal practices had been deeply flawed.
The report from BBC Amharic also highlighted suggestions from some factions to consider a confederation-style government. This proposal, entertained by about a quarter of the participants, offered an alternative perspective. There was an underlying accusation pointing towards certain groups who, allegedly, have ambitions to revert to a unitary government system.
Skepticism lingered regarding ethnic federalism. Over decades, critics have argued that governance tethered to ethnicity undermines citizens’ rights, effectively alienating Ethiopians when they reside outside their ethnic homeland regions.
On constitutional change, debates focused on Article 39’s sanctity, which advocates the right to secession. This clause stirs the pot, with many Ethiopians viewing it as a risky combination of ethnic politics and potential national security threats—fueling fears of outside interference in Ethiopia’s sovereignty.
Meanwhile, this week saw the Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF) step away from the National Dialogue process. Their withdrawal, citing concerns over “neutrality,” adds another layer to the ongoing discussions.
Edited by: Ali Musa
alimusa@axadletimes.com
Axadle international–Monitoring