Security lapse exposed as Al‑Shabaab storms NISA detention centre near Mogadishu’s seat of power
MOGADISHU — Grainy, extended video footage verified by Somali security agencies has revealed how Al‑Shabaab militants slipped into the capital and mounted a daring raid on Godka Jilacow, a detention facility run by the National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA), underscoring fresh questions about gaps in urban security and the growing sophistication of the Islamist group.
- Advertisement -
The footage, circulated by state media and checked by government operatives, shows a Toyota Hilux pickup painted in NISA colours travelling from the Afgoye corridor into Mogadishu. The vehicle — and the militants inside it — are seen passing multiple checkpoints in plain sight, reaching Godka Jilacow in little more than an hour before launching the attack on the night of October 4.
“They used the uniform of the state against the state,” a security analyst who reviewed the video for this report said. “This was a coordinated, deceptive operation designed to exploit familiar patterns of movement.”
What happened at Godka Jilacow
Godka Jilacow, a compound used by NISA for interrogations and detention that sits within walking distance of the presidential palace, came under assault when the militants, some disguised in agency gear, opened fire and tried to breach the facility. Somali authorities say seven attackers were killed after an exchange of gunfire that flared intermittently through the night before security forces regained control of the site by Sunday morning.
Officials have acknowledged the attack exposed “loopholes” in security but have not publicly confirmed whether prisoners escaped or how many. Local residents and security sources tell reporters that the raid may have enabled the escape of hardened militants — an outcome that would mark an alarming setback for a country still battling the insurgency.
A shopkeeper near the palace, speaking on condition of anonymity because of fear of reprisals, described waking to sporadic shots. “We heard gunfire until dawn. People stayed indoors. It felt like the whole city had swallowed its breath,” she said. The footage shows the attackers moving without being stopped — a development that has intensified public unease.
Checks that failed to check the attackers
Security experts say several factors combined to let the militants through: the adoption of official livery on vehicles; the timing — just hours after few roadblocks that had been in place were lifted; and the sheer brazenness of the plan. In the video, a man stands in the middle of the road at about 15:50, an observer noted, apparently not challenged as the NISA‑painted pickup rolled by.
“When combatants start wearing your uniform and painting their trucks in your colours, checkpoints and identification become less reliable,” said Ahmed Farah, a former Somali intelligence officer now advising a regional security think tank. “You must reintroduce layered verification — plates, call‑in checks, biometric gates — or the deception works every time.”
Somalia has long worried about infiltration within its security services. Previous allegations have suggested the group has cultivated informants inside the Somali National Army and intelligence ranks. Authorities so far say there is no evidence of collusion in Saturday’s raid; yet the incident has widened suspicion about how well protected critical sites really are.
Broader context: a pattern of disguise and opportunism
Al‑Shabaab’s use of disguises and mimicry is not new; extremist movements have increasingly relied on spoofed identities to bypass defences from Afghanistan to West Africa. In Somalia, where the international military footprint has been shrinking and the transition to Somali‑led security is incomplete, such tactics are particularly dangerous.
Over the past decade the insurgency has adapted tactics from frontal assaults to complex, deceptive operations in urban settings. The Godka Jilacow raid demonstrates both the group’s operational reach into the capital and its ability to exploit days when traffic or security routines are altered. Globally, counterterrorism experts warn that adversaries will intensify the use of “blended” tactics — a mix of small‑unit assaults, masquerades, and cyber or information operations — to erode public trust in institutions.
Immediate implications and unanswered questions
-
Loss of confidence: The attack, occurring so close to the presidential palace, is likely to intensify public concern about the government’s ability to protect Mogadishu’s most sensitive sites.
-
Internal inquiry: Security agencies will face pressure to explain how a vehicle in official colours reached the capital unchecked and whether internal procedures failed.
-
Prisoner situation: Officials have been cautious about confirming any large‑scale escape. If inmates did flee, tracking and re‑apprehending them will complicate an already fragile security environment.
In the short term the government faces a test of both capacity and credibility: can it close the practical and procedural gaps this footage exposed, and can it restore public faith that state symbols and uniforms will no longer be turned into weapons?
“This was not only a physical attack on a facility; it was an assault on the symbols of state authority,” a Mogadishu lawyer said. “We must ask how easily the badge of office can be appropriated.”
For Somalis, the raid is a reminder that while the shape of the fight against Al‑Shabaab may change, its ability to hit hard and surprise remains. And for international partners and analysts, it raises larger questions about transitions in security responsibility: as external forces lessen their footprint, are national systems ready to withstand a more adaptive enemy?
As investigations proceed, the video of the operation will likely be dissected and re‑examined by both investigators and insurgents eager to learn which tactics worked. The key questions — about who knew what, why checkpoints failed, and whether prison security was adequate — remain. How Somalia answers them will shape not just the immediate security posture of Mogadishu but perceptions of the state’s control of its capital.
By Ali Musa
Axadle Times international–Monitoring.
