MOGADISHU, Somalia – In a pivotal moment for Somalia, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has passionately defended his initiative for direct elections. He argues persuasively that Somalis deserve a transparent electoral process where everyone can participate equally in choosing their leaders. This position, while bold, has generated significant controversy and discourse.

Imagine a country emerging from decades of turmoil. The current proposition to transition from the customary indirect model to a direct electoral system is a momentous shift. A few months ago, the president broached this idea, stirring a hornet’s nest among opposition figures. What truly lies at the heart of their resistance? Some assert it’s an attempt by Mohamud to extend his office tenure, potentially skirting constitutional boundaries. The debate is not just about elections; it’s about trust. Consider this: Can political evolution succeed without robust public trust?

The National Consultative Council’s recent meeting in Mogadishu became the stage for this heated discussion. Despite the absence of major opposition leaders and representatives from Northeastern State and Jubaland, Mohamud’s message was clear: unity is paramount. “We must put an end to divisive rhetoric and actions that threaten the fabric of our unity,” he urged. His words resonate with a deeply relevant question: How can a nation heal if it remains fragmented?

The vision of universal suffrage is one of reconstruction—an antidote to the instability that’s marred Somalia for years. Mohamud places the blame squarely on the ineffective governance models previously supervised by international bodies. His vision is an audacious endeavor to rejuvenate national governance. Sharing a quote from Mohamud: “The Somali people deserve a transparent and inclusive electoral process, and we are determined to deliver it.” This commitment is less a statement and more of a promise to his people.

Reflecting on indirect elections, Mohamud argued they have fostered enduring conflicts. Could the adoption of direct voting be the key to breaking this cycle? This is where the opposition’s involvement becomes crucial. Collaborative governance seems to be the only way forward, especially for such an ambitious goal. The president’s call to action invites opposition leaders to join the reform journey, transforming skepticism into productivity.

International allies have long been supportive, yet Mohamud emphasizes the importance of internal accountability. “The international community has fulfilled much of what we’ve asked. Now, the responsibility lies with us to finish the work, to move beyond our past and build a resilient, functioning state,” Mohamud asserted. These words call to mind the timeless wisdom that “the responsibility to initiate change lies within one’s own hands.” His approach seems simple—empower local frameworks while acknowledging external support.

Nevertheless, the decision by key opposition actors to boycott this consultative meeting poses challenges. Without their participation, can the meeting’s outcomes truly carry weight? The absence of consensus among Somalia’s key figures raises concerns, even as international partners push for a unified front. Unity is not just a goal; it’s a need as palpable as the air we breathe.

What’s most compelling in Mohamud’s stance is the direct appeal to the nation’s collective consciousness: Shouldn’t the future of Somalia be shaped by its own people? The road ahead is undoubtedly fraught with challenges, but the promise of a stable future might just be incentive enough to spur long-awaited changes.

In summary, the path to electoral reform in Somalia, advocated by President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, could redefine not just governance, but the nation’s history itself. It is a journey toward sovereignty, unity, and hope.