French prime minister resigns hours after naming new cabinet, deepening political turmoil
What happened
- Advertisement -
France’s newly appointed prime minister, Sébastien Lecornu, abruptly resigned on Thursday morning just hours after unveiling his cabinet, throwing President Emmanuel Macron’s government into fresh and immediate uncertainty.
The Élysée confirmed the move in a brief statement: “Mr Sébastien Lecornu has submitted the resignation of his Government to the President of the Republic, who has accepted it.” Lecornu, a close ally of Macron who had been appointed only last month, handed in his resignation after allies and opponents alike signalled they would move to topple his administration.
The resignation was unexpected and, according to several observers, unprecedented in contemporary French politics. The cabinet Lecornu announced late yesterday had been scheduled to meet this afternoon, but that session — and any chance to begin governing — was cancelled before it could start.
Immediate fallout: markets and mood
Markets reacted swiftly. French stocks fell sharply and the euro lost ground against major currencies as investors digested the renewed political volatility. The sell-off reflected concern over the country’s ability to enact policy with a fragmented parliament and the likelihood of further political standoffs.
On the streets of Paris, the mood was one of weary bemusement. “People are tired of the constant churn in politics,” said a barista near the National Assembly as commuters paused for their morning coffee. “It feels like we haven’t had a stable government in years.”
Why this matters: a fragile majority and fast turnover
The resignation is the latest episode in a period of mounting instability since Macron’s re-election in 2022. No single party or coalition in the National Assembly holds a clear majority, and Macron’s decision to call snap parliamentary elections last year only deepened the fragmentation — producing a legislature in which building enduring majorities is a daily political challenge.
Lecornu was Macron’s fifth prime minister in two years, a rapid turnover that underscores the broader problem: in a divided parliament, prime ministers are often chosen more for their ability to seek compromise than to pursue long-term agendas. But compromise has proved elusive.
Political allies complained privately that Lecornu had struggled to assemble a cabinet capable of placating competing factions, while opponents warned they would not allow what they saw as a weak government to stand. That combination of internal dissent and external hostility proved decisive.
Broader trends and global parallels
France’s latest political crisis reflects a wider pattern in established democracies: fragmentation of traditional party systems, the rise of populist movements, and greater difficulty in forming stable governing coalitions. From Italy to Israel to Spain in recent years, countries have grappled with similar challenges — short-lived governments, snap elections, and frequent cabinet reshuffles.
For Macron, who campaigned on a platform of economic reform and European leadership, the churn at home complicates efforts to project stability abroad. European partners and investors watch closely: political instability in a major eurozone economy has implications for fiscal policy, European cohesion, and markets.
Analysts say the rapid turnover also raises fundamental questions about governance under France’s current parliamentary configuration. Can a head of state and a succession of short-term prime ministers navigate a fractious Assembly to pass the kind of reforms that require steady leadership? Or will policymaking increasingly give way to brinkmanship and short-term calculations?
What comes next
The Élysée did not immediately announce who would replace Lecornu. Under France’s constitution, President Macron will now consult political leaders and select a new prime minister to try to form a government that can command confidence in the fractured parliament.
The next steps could include the appointment of a caretaker administration, renewed attempts to build a cross-party majority, or even the spectre of new elections if a durable governing coalition cannot be found. Each option carries risks: caretaker governments are limited in scope, coalition talks can be protracted, and fresh elections could further fragment the political landscape.
For ordinary citizens, the immediate concern is practical: will the authorities remain capable of steering the economy and responding to daily challenges such as inflation, public services and social unrest? For investors and international partners, the concern is whether France can maintain continuity in policy and international commitments amid repeated leadership changes.
Questions for the future
France’s political upheaval invites deeper queries: How will parties adapt to the altered ground of a legislature without clear majorities? Will Macron recalibrate his approach — seeking broader, more conciliatory alliances — or press on with a strategy that risks continued instability? And how will this episode shape voters’ attitudes ahead of future national and local polls?
As the country awaits the next move from the Élysée, the broader lesson is familiar: stable governance depends not only on election outcomes but on the capacity of institutions and leaders to forge working majorities. In an era of political fragmentation, that task has grown harder, with consequences that reach far beyond any single cabinet shuffle.
By Abdiwahab Ahmed
Axadle Times international–Monitoring.
