Garowe (AX) — In a recent turn of events, Northeastern State authorities declared their non-recognition of the SSC-Khaatumo administration. They published a statement asserting that there’s no legal foundation for a distinct regional government to represent the Dhulbahante community. This declaration sets off ripples of tension within an already complex political landscape.
- Advertisement -
On Wednesday, the Northeastern State Ministry of Interior conveyed its position, acknowledging the pivotal role the Dhulbahante people played in the re-liberation of Las Anod on February 6, 2023. Yet, they were firm in their refusal to support the inception of an independent administration within that region.
“The Northeastern State government clearly states that there is no law that allows the Dhulbahante community to form a separate administration,” the ministry articulated. This sentiment resonates deeply, not only within the corridors of Northeastern State governance but also among those who have long sensed that sovereignty is a complex beast indeed.
The statement went on to stress the integral role that all clans residing in Sool, Cayn, and broader Dhulbahante territories have played in the formation and development of Northeastern State since its establishment in 1998. It’s a testament to the interconnectedness that has defined this region, highlighting the often-overlooked nuanced relationships that are woven into the fabric of social and political life.
However, Northeastern State did not stop there. The ministry voiced its concerns regarding what it termed as interference from the Federal Government of Somalia in its internal security affairs. It raises the question: how does one balance governance with local autonomy? The ministry warned that such interruptions could catalyze destabilization, potentially creating fertile ground for extremist factions like al-Shabaab and ISIS to take hold. It’s a delicate equilibrium—maintaining order while respecting the aspirations of diverse communities.
In the face of this declaration, the SSC-Khaatumo administration stood its ground, vigorously defending its legitimacy. Vice President Dr. Mohamed Ismail Shiine addressed the issue directly. “The existence of SSC is not up for debate,” he stated with an air of unwavering confidence. “The statement from the Ministry of Interior of Northeastern State is unfortunate. The SSC-Khaatumo administration is a member state of the country’s federal system, and no one is allowed to question its existence.” Such assertions cut to the core of the ongoing dispute over governance in the region. One is compelled to ponder: what does legitimacy truly mean in a complex federal structure?
This exchange arrives amid a high-level conference in Las Anod, the capital of the Sool region, which is pivotal in actualizing SSC-Khaatumo’s transition from an interim authority to a fully recognized federal member state. Earlier this year, the Federal Government of Somalia acknowledged SSC-Khaatumo following a protracted struggle with North Western State of Somalia forces and shifting political currents in northern Somalia. The stakes are high, and so too are the emotions tied to regional identity and governance.
Navigating through these waters brings to mind a vivid anecdote: a time when community members in Las Anod gathered not just to discuss administrative matters, but to engage in dialogues rich with history and shared experiences. They reflected on their struggles and victories as a collective. It’s these moments that remind us of the human element within governance—the stories, aspirations, and fears that intertwine with decisions made in lofty offices far removed from everyday life.
As the political machinations unfold, one can’t help but wonder about the broader implications of such conflicts. The interplay between Northeastern State’s assertion and SSC-Khaatumo’s claim prompts questions about how power and recognition shape our sense of belonging. To what extent do we define ourselves by lines drawn on a map versus the communities in which we reside and thrive?
Ultimately, this discord is not merely about territorial disputes or administrative authority; it is about identity, legacy, and the search for meaningful representation. History, after all, is rarely linear. As we navigate the currents of politics, we may find ourselves grappling with issues that remind us of our shared humanity.
In the ever-evolving narrative of Northeastern State and SSC-Khaatumo, the path forward remains uncertain, yet it is paved with opportunities for dialogue and understanding. Will both parties find common ground? Only time will tell, but the echoes of these deliberations will linger in the hearts and minds of the people affected—those whose lives are intertwined in the fabric of governance and community.
Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times International – Monitoring.
