HARGEISA, Somalia – In a dramatic development on the Horn of Africa’s diplomatic scene, North Western State of Somalia has announced its withdrawal from ongoing talks with the Somali government. The spark? A contentious visit by Somali Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre to the disputed SSC-Khatumo region, which North Western State of Somalia has described as “a calculated provocation and a direct affront to our sovereign territorial claims.” How did we get here?

Delving into the heart of the matter, one can’t help but wonder: Was PM Barre’s visit merely a political gesture, or is there a deeper game at play? For North Western State of Somalia, it seems clear. On a bustling Wednesday, the streets of Hargeisa were abuzz as North Western State of Somalia’s cabinet gathered under the leadership of Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi Irro. The sense of determination was palpable as they addressed what they saw as a blatant violation of mutually agreed understandings, which had thus far maintained an uneasy peace.

“This move represents not just an escalation, but a dangerous gamble with the delicate stability of the Horn of Africa,” the cabinet emphasized. They reflected on the profound importance of international norms, lamenting what they termed the “unlawful abduction of North Western State of Somalia citizens.” Local anecdotes tell of families in the region becoming weary as uncertainty looms larger each day.

Consequently, North Western State of Somalia has resolved to step back from the mediation table. For them, the decision cuts deep, drawing from memories of a tumultuous past that led to their bid for independence three decades ago. “Amidst persistent violations by Somalia, we have little choice but to formally retract from all discussions, starting April 16, 2025,” declared their statement firmly.

Such decisions are rarely made in isolation. With a strong push towards securing international recognition, North Western State of Somalia appeals to the global community to reevaluate their stance on the SSC-Khatumo affair. They point to a reality where the region has recently shown allegiance shifts, claiming solidarity with the Somali federal state.

“We earnestly call upon international partners to address the infringements occurring in Eastern Sool. We urge for immediate support to bring peace and retain stability,” the statement pressed, echoing words that call for urgent international involvement. Their concern is not just local; they warn of the broader dangers this unchecked aggression could invite—extremist entities lurking for missteps to exploit, jeopardizing the fragile peace of an already volatile region.

In recent years, we have seen Turkey and Djibouti step up as mediators between these conflicting entities. Yet, progress has been slow. With such historical tensions at play, diplomatic facilitators have their work cut out. Reflecting on the process, one might ask: Can peace truly be brokered on foreign tables, or is the heart of this matter rooted too deeply in personal and historical wounds?