Somalia: Al-Shabaab’s Clan Divide and Government Oversight
Somalia at a Crossroads: Navigating Challenges and Unveiling Opportunities
Imagine a nation greatly endowed with untapped oil reserves and fertile lands, bordered by the longest coastline in mainland Africa. A country with strategic positioning that could redefine its regional power dynamics—the foundation for a thriving economy and a beacon of stability. Yet, Somalia’s reality starkly contrasts this potential, mired in conflict and uncertainty for nearly four decades.
The journey towards peace and prosperity is challenging, demanding a holistic approach from its leaders. Unfortunately, instead of architects of change, its choicest leaders have become caretakers of stagnation. With dwindling U.S. aid, waning counter-terrorism support, and a fatigued Europe reducing attention, Somalia faces isolation. Amid this, al-Shabaab persists, arguably more emboldened than ever. But is anyone truly looking closely at the internal fractures within its ranks?
In an attempt to unify national forces against the looming threat of terrorism, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has called for a national consultation. With a quote that resonated widely, he extended an invitation: “I am inviting politicians and community leaders to join hands in our battle against the terrorists.” As the opposition cautiously examines the potential of this dialogue, the real battle remains hidden, deep within al-Shabaab’s fabric.
Reflecting on a notable moment in 2021, Boqor Osman Aw Mohamud—or Boqor Buurmadow—an influential traditional leader from North Western State of Somalia, shared an anecdote wrapped in truth during a Mogadishu assembly: “There are two governments in Somalia: The Federal Government and the al-Shabaab Government, and we head one of them.” Humorously delivered yet packed with somber reality.
Peeling back the layers of al-Shabaab’s internal dynamics reveals a simmering power clash. Dominated by Dir and Hawiye clans, the group teeters on the brink of even deeper discord. Historically led by reclusive Dir leaders like Ahmed Diriye, it presents a stark duality with its more public Hawiye figures—such as Ali Dhere, Mahad Karate, and Yusuf Kabakudukade.
As al-Shabaab watches the resurgence of the Taliban in Afghanistan and the shift in governance strategies of groups like Hayat Tahrir al-Sham in Syria, it contemplates its own transformation. This ideological reflection, however, seems to ignite existing tensions rather than foster consolidation. Could this be a form of ideological retribution for the years of terror in Somalia?
Plunge deeper, and strategic dilemmas emerge. Should dialogues sponsored by Norway, Qatar, Turkey, and the U.S. take form, who then represents al-Shabaab? Public acclaim seems to favor Hawiye for dialogue leadership, sidelining the covert Dir leaders. Conscious of losing grip, al-Shabaab’s leader begins to elevate prominent Dir figures as public symbols of strength. Herein lies a ripple effect—anxiety, even within its ranks.
“The greatest danger in times of turbulence is not the turbulence — it is to act with yesterday’s logic.” — Peter Drucker
This strategic pivot unveils figures like the former academic Nageye Ali Khalif, poet Abdiwahid Gama’did, and cleric Sheikh Adan Sune. As they find prominence within the group, implications are not lost on the current Hawiye elites, who consequently reassess their alliances and defensive strategies. An old lesson lingers—a reminder of past purges such as the 2013 coup that saw Godane eliminate potential rivals.
Al-Shabaab’s traditional recruitment relied on marginalized clans for foot soldiers, leaving leadership to the major clans. Now, adapting brings internal realignment: sub-clan loyalty and external re-engagement become paramount. This palpable shift resends an urgent question: can al-Shabaab reconcile its ideological rifts while transitioning towards governance?
International eyes are now subtly drawing closer. Norway’s diplomatic overtures, alongside Turkey, Qatar, and the U.S., hint at potential negotiations. Though still nascent and fragile, these overtures could redefine Somalia’s trajectory.
Al-Shabaab’s most haunting legacy remains the epicenter of Africa’s deadliest suicide bombing in Mogadishu, 2017. Yet, the group’s capacity to govern remains uncharted territory. How do you govern when the only currency you’ve known is destruction?
At this junction, Somalia stands poised between transformation and turmoil. It can emerge as a beacon of progress, or spiral into further chaos. Al-Shabaab’s internal strife may unravel or redefine its goals, presenting a rare opportunity for Somalia’s legitimate leadership to seize the narrative.
It all hinges—will this be a pivotal moment for Somalia or just another fleeting chance?