U.S. government grinds to a halt as partisan stalemate triggers shutdown
WASHINGTON — Much of the United States federal government shut its doors early today after Congress failed to pass a short-term funding bill, setting off what officials warned could be a prolonged and costly stand‑off that will touch millions of Americans and ripple through global markets.
- Advertisement -
The shutdown — the 15th since 1981 — began hours after the Senate rejected a stopgap measure that would have kept agencies operating through Nov. 21. Agencies warned that the lapse in appropriations will suspend everything from the release of a closely watched September employment report to scientific research, while slowing air travel, withholding pay from service members and forcing about 750,000 federal employees to be furloughed at an estimated cost of $400 million a day.
Immediate effects: agencies, airports, troops and data
Federal agencies move to “essential” operations only during funding lapses, which means border inspections, air traffic control and active military operations continue — but many administrative functions and routine services stop. The Labor Department said the September jobs report could be delayed, disrupting an important data point for investors and policymakers. NASA, research laboratories and countless grant programmes have been warned to pause work.
White House and administration figures framed the shutdown as an opportunity to remodel government spending. President Donald Trump, who has already said his administration will slim the federal workforce — projecting up to 300,000 fewer government employees by December — warned Democrats that a prolonged closure could clear the way for “irreversible” cuts to jobs and programmes.
Why the stalemate happened
The fight centers on roughly $1.7 trillion in discretionary agency funding — about one-quarter of a broader $7 trillion federal budget that also includes entitlements, debt service and other mandatory spending. Republicans control both chambers of Congress, but the Senate’s 60‑vote threshold for most spending measures means bipartisan support is still required; at least seven Democrats would need to break ranks to pass most bills.
Senate Republican leader John Thune said the short‑term bill was a non‑partisan, ordinary measure. “What’s changed is, President Trump is in the White House. That’s what this is about,” he told reporters, saying the impasse reflects politics more than policy.
Democrats, under pressure from a base anxious about healthcare and other domestic priorities ahead of the 2026 midterms, have pushed to extend health subsidies and to include protections that would make it harder for the president to reverse their gains. Those demands collided with Republican insistence on spending restraint and administration threats to use the crisis to force deeper cuts.
Rhetoric escalates
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer accused Republicans of trying to “bully” Democrats into capitulation. “All they want to do is try to bully us. And they’re not going to succeed,” he said after a White House meeting that ended with the parties far apart. Schumer also condemned a manipulated campaign video circulated by the president targeting top Democrats as “childish” and “petty,” saying the tactic underscored how unserious leadership had become about averting harm to ordinary Americans.
On the other side, Russell Vought, the president’s budget director, has openly called for “less bipartisan” appropriations and warned of permanent layoffs if a shutdown occurs — language that heightened fears of a deeper reordering of the federal workforce.
Markets and global consequences
Investors reacted quickly. U.S. stock futures slipped while gold climbed to a record as traders sought safety. Asian markets wavered and the dollar fell toward a one‑week low against major currencies as worries grew that missing U.S. economic data and lost wages could sap global growth momentum.
Economists caution that even short shutdowns can leave lasting scars: delayed surveys and stalled regulatory approvals ripple through supply chains and corporate planning. For foreign governments and traders who rely on timely U.S. data and continuity, a shutdown raises questions about the reliability of the world’s largest economy at a time when geopolitical frictions and inflation concerns already complicate policy making.
What happens next?
There is no clear path to reopening the government. Lawmakers could pass another short‑term continuing resolution, but the Senate vote suggests that neither side is ready to yield on core demands. The longest shutdown in American history lasted 35 days in 2018–19 during Mr. Trump’s first term, as leaders squabbled over border security; that episode left agencies scrambling and federal workers in financial distress.
Analysts say this shutdown could last longer than most because both parties face intense pressure from hardline elements within their coalitions. Robert Pape, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, warned that the rules of U.S. politics are shifting, with extreme wings on both sides making compromise harder and potentially transforming ordinary fiscal fights into existential tests for party leaders.
For millions of federal workers and Americans who rely on government services, the calculus is brutally simple: paychecks and permits vanish quickly, but the political consequences are measured over months and elections. For international partners and markets, the spectacle raises an uncomfortable question: how stable is a government whose day-to‑day function can be halted by political brinkmanship?
As lawmakers return to frantic negotiations, airports, laboratories and military families brace for disruption. The shutdown’s length will depend not only on votes in Washington but on whether party leaders can find the narrow space to trade concessions without alienating fierce supporters. Will the politics of escalation win out over the practical need to keep government running — and at what cost to public trust in institutions?
By Abdiwahab Ahmed
Axadle Times international–Monitoring.
