US President Donald Trump’s vision for a so-called “Riviera of the Middle East,” which involves claiming control over Gaza, has met a chorus of disapproval and outright rejection from nations across the globe. The implications of such plans raise serious questions about sovereignty, identity, and the right to life in a region fraught with conflict.
- Advertisement -
Amid these discussions, 24-year-old Mohammed Abushaban, a resident of Gaza, voiced his frustration with the President’s remarks in a recent conversation with RTE’s Morning Ireland. “They cannot just plan for our future,” he declared, his voice brimming with conviction and defiance.
Mr. Abushaban’s thoughts resonate deeply: “We can make the decision [about leaving Gaza], not you.” His reference indicates a disquieting truth—those in power often overlook the voices of those most affected by their decisions. In his eyes, Trump’s proposal to resettle Gazans in neighboring Arab countries is not merely a logistical plan; it feels like an erasure of his identity and existence.
“You cannot talk about us. You cannot do whatever you want about for us,” he continued, underscoring a crucial point that often gets lost in policy discussions. For him and many others, these matters are intensely personal. Mr. Abushaban’s statements evoke a powerful emotion; he signifies a populace yearning for agency and recognition in their own narratives, a plea often ignored amidst political machinations.
Resilience is more than just a trait; for Mohammed, it is a way of life. Abushaban has been diligently working as an information health assistant for the International Medical Corps since the onset of the current war. His role not only highlights the urgency of healthcare in crisis but also reveals the commitment of individuals who strive to make a change even amidst chaos.
Currently, he resides in his grandfather’s house with several family members, including his younger sister. The weight of responsibility is heavy, but he carries it with pride. “We’re not leaving. We’re not following any plan,” he insists with determination simmering just beneath the surface. “You cannot force me to leave this land—me, my little sister, or anyone else.” His sentiment strikes at the very core of belonging—an unwavering attachment to one’s homeland that no geopolitical maneuver can sever.
Since the conflict reignited, his days are consumed by the struggle simply to survive. Abushaban reveals his reality: “I’m just trying to survive here, actually.” His unadorned admission paints a grim picture—a focus on day-to-day existence, where normalcy is a distant memory. Imagine a young man, brimming with aspirations, now reduced to the essentials of survival. What dreams lie dormant amid such chaos? This thought lingers in the air, casting shadows on the hopes of a generation.
Reflecting on the broader implications of attempts to relocate Gazans, he emphasizes deeply rooted connections to the land. “My people have been living here for generations,” he states, his voice echoing with the weight of history. The land is not merely a geographical location for him; it embodies the essence of his identity. “This land is my history. I was born here,” he affirms, each word steeped in a profound sense of belonging that cannot be easily dismissed.
In a world increasingly fragmented by political agendas and ideological divides, the voice of individuals like Mohammed Abushaban is crucial. The stories of resilience, determination, and hope must not be drowned out by the cacophony of diplomacy and rhetoric. As leaders and policymakers sit in their high offices, far removed from the realities of life in Gaza, the words of its inhabitants serve as a stark reminder of what is at stake.
Choice is fundamental to the human experience, and for Mohammed and his community, the choice to remain in their homeland is one they fiercely protect. They are not mere pawns in a geopolitical game; they are individuals with aspirations, dreams, and an unyielding attachment to their past. As the dialogue around Gaza continues, one must ask: how do we ensure that voices like Mr. Abushaban’s are heard and respected in these discussions? In moments of profound crisis, shouldn’t the narratives of those living through it be central to any plan for the future?
Ultimately, it is through understanding and acknowledging these stories that we can hope to grasp the complexity of the human condition within the context of ongoing conflicts. It is not just about land; it is about people—families, children, dreams, histories. And in that understanding lies the possibility of peace.
Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times international–Monitoring
