Skip to content
Thursday, July 9, 2026 Mogadishu 29°C Breaking: Trump Warns Iran Ceasefire Is ‘Over’ as NATO Leaders Meet in Ankara
Breaking News
Axadle | Stay Informed with Horn of Africa Headlines

My Axadle

Saved stories

Followed topics

Reader preferences

Language
Edition

East-Africa English

Zimbabwe’s Mnangagwa Enacts Controversial New Law

Follow
Zimbabwe's Mnangagwa signs controversial law
Zimbabwe's Mnangagwa Enacts Controversial New Law

In a move set to reshape Zimbabwe’s political landscape, President Emmerson Mnangagwa on Tuesday signed a contentious constitutional amendment extending his term by two years, now ending in 2030. This marks one of the most significant political shifts since the 2013 Constitution.

Nick Mangwana, a government spokesperson, confirmed the President’s approval of the Constitutional Amendment (No. 3) Act. The new law delays the next general elections from 2028 to 2030 and introduces a series of reforms impacting the electoral, judicial, and political systems.

The legislation has sparked widespread criticism from opposition parties, civil society, constitutional lawyers, and some liberation war veterans. They argue it undermines democratic institutions and concentrates power within the ruling ZANU-PF party.

Sweeping Constitutional Changes

The amendment extends presidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years, allowing Mnangagwa to stay in power until 2030, rather than finishing his expected term in 2028.

Significantly, future presidents will no longer be directly elected. Instead, Parliament will elect the head of state, a change supporters claim will enhance stability but opponents warn strips voters of vital democratic rights.

Additional changes include expanding the Senate from 80 to 90 members, increasing presidential appointments, and shifting voter registration duties from the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission to the Registrar-General.

Judicial reforms, another crucial component, eliminate public interviews for senior judicial roles and introduce a new Judge President position in the Supreme Court.

Long-Planned Political Reform

The amendment reflects efforts by ZANU-PF, which has led since independence in 1980, to solidify its authority. The process began in October 2025, with Cabinet approval following in February 2026, and subsequent advancements in Parliament with significant majorities.

On June 18, the National Assembly passed the bill with 216 votes in favor and 42 against, surpassing the required two-thirds majority. The Senate followed suit, endorsing the legislation by a 75-4 margin, paving the way for the President’s signature.

A President’s Tenure Extended

Mnangagwa, 83, who assumed power in November 2017 after the military deposed Robert Mugabe, was re-elected in 2018 under contentious circumstances and again in 2023. The prior constitutional framework limited him to two terms, ending in 2028. The new law not only extends his presidency by two years but also aligns parliamentary and presidential elections to a seven-year cycle.

Intensified Democracy Concerns

The constitutional changes have stirred intense political debate in Zimbabwe. Opposition leaders argue the amendment contravenes the 2013 Constitution’s “no-benefit” provision, designed to avoid extending a sitting president’s tenure unless approved by a national referendum.

Critics caution that allowing Parliament to select future presidents could entrench ZANU-PF’s dominance, given its legislative majority. Changes affecting voter registration, judicial appointments, and Senate composition further worry those advocating for institutional independence and electoral fairness.

Despite several legal challenges, ZANU-PF’s legislative strength facilitated the rapid passage of the bill.

High Stakes for Zimbabwe’s Future

Amid ongoing economic challenges, including currency instability, high unemployment, inflation, and infrastructural difficulties, the government argues the reforms will ensure policy continuity and political stability for completing long-term projects.

Conversely, opponents view these amendments as a regression for constitutional democracy, eroding checks and balances and focusing power with ZANU-PF.