SA President Cyril Ramaphosa hits again at predecessor Jacob Zuma for ‘personal prosecution’

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has criticized his predecessor Jacob Zuma for his last-minute try and power him to withdraw as a candidate through the newest ruling African Nationwide Congress management contest.

President Ramaphosa, who has known as Zuma’s transfer an “abuse of legal process”, has utilized for an pressing ban on the previous president’s newest authorized antics.

- Advertisement -

Ramaphosa disputes Zuma’s allegations that he didn’t act because the nation’s president towards Billy Downer (the lead state prosecutor in Zuma’s 18-year corruption saga) within the former South African chief’s personal prosecution of Downer and a journalist he accuses of “leaking” and printed his medical situation.

The South African president has utilized to the Pretoria Excessive Court docket to quash a subpoena served on him relating to Zuma’s personal prosecution.

Earlier than that call, Ramaphosa requested the courtroom to reject what Zuma mentioned, describing it as “a gross abuse of the legal process”.

Learn: Ramaphosa to testify towards Zuma in state seize inquiry

Certainly, Zuma accused Ramaphosa of failing to behave on his allegations of “bias” on the a part of Downer, as 17 years in the past. efficiently prosecuted Zuma’s former monetary advisor on the identical 783 counts of fraud, cash laundering and corruption that the previous president at the moment faces.

Medical situation

Zuma returns to courtroom on January 30, 2023. He has didn’t get Downer faraway from the case. He had wished Ramaphosa to seem in courtroom on January 19, as one of many “accused” in his personal prosecution towards Downer and journalist Karyn Maughan for “leaking” his much-disputed medical situation. This was printed in a report by Maughan.

Downer has denied leaking any details about Zuma’s medical situation to Maughan.

Maughan, who has intently adopted Zuma’s many authorized ordeals and engagements, mentioned she bought the data from one other prosecutor. She mentioned the data was contained in one of many authorized issues the place Zuma’s well being was cited.

Zuma’s launch after serving two months in jail was controversial.

The courts have subsequently convicted, illegally, of his shut ally and former chief administrative officer of prisons, Arthur Fraser, after simply two months behind bars final yr, ostensibly due to Zuma’s then-unknown medical “condition”.

Learn: Interpol considers purple discover for Jacob Zuma’s allies, the Guptas

Contemplating that Zuma’s “condition”, protected below South Africa’s structure as extremely privileged data, could have been “chronic”, however nowhere close to as critical as acknowledged, the designated parole had refused Zuma’s requested early medical launch from a 15-month interval of jail sentence for contempt, imposed by the Constitutional Court docket.

The previous administrative head of the prisons, Arthur Fraser, who was additionally the individual behind the felony costs laid towards Ramaphosa in early June this yr, associated to the theft of US$580,000 from the president’s Phala Phala sport farm in February 2020, overruled the suspended sentence on board and freed Zuma anyway.


After failing in a sequence of tribunals as much as the Supreme Constitutional Court docket to have Downer faraway from his personal prosecution, Zuma utilized for the precise to carry a personal prosecution towards Downer and Maughan, allegedly for breaching his constitutionally protected privateness rights to medical data.

After declining to press costs, Zuma was granted the precise of personal prosecution, though the overwhelming majority of authorized analysts think about the hassle doomed, and most have described it as simply one other factor of Zuma’s long-standing “Stalingrad defense” technique to utilizing authorized processes to delay their very own day within the dock.

In what was clearly a plan to sideline Ramaphosa and forestall his second time period as ruling celebration and nationwide chief, Zuma’s “inclusion” of Ramaphosa the day earlier than the convention within the personal prosecution was supposed to make the president ineligible for current ANC elections. convention.

Learn: Zuma seeks delay as graft trial resumes on-line with out supportive crowd

Backed by a lot of the ANC’s celebration management and constructions, Ramaphosa emerged victorious.

Nonetheless, Zuma has remained defiant, insisting that the summons acquired by Ramaphosa is authorized and that he should seem as a co-accused alongside Downer and Maughan within the Johannesburg Excessive Court docket on the date specified.

Ramaphosa has in flip lashed out at Zuma in a six-page letter despatched to the previous president for his makes an attempt to “abuse the processes of the law” by implicating him in his graft case.

If he had acted towards Downer, Ramaphosa identified, he would have violated his oath by interfering in a course of the place he had no authority.

Mockingly, such unconstitutional “interference” was one of many main wrongdoings laid at Zuma’s toes by Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, within the latter’s report on his four-year graft probe when Zuma was president.

Corruption trial

In addition to successfully difficult the legality of Zuma’s try and engineer yet one more delay in his corruption trial by attacking his prosecutors’ proper to behave for the state, Ramaphosa desires the Excessive Court docket to rule on January 10 that the cost towards him is void in legislation.

Ramaphosa desires Zuma to be barred from taking any additional steps in his personal prosecution and for Zuma, who already has enormous authorized payments to pay, to cowl his prices of defending himself from this newest authorized assault.

Authorized analysts have mentioned the case towards Downer and Maughan was “an extreme stretch”, allowed below South African legislation however with no likelihood of success primarily based on identified info.

The most recent foray by Zuma into doubtful legalisms has elevated the monetary stress on him by way of his many authorized engagements with costly legal professionals.

The State Legal professional’s Workplace has confirmed it should sue the previous president for the $1 million, “plus interest”, Zuma owes in state-funded protection prices.

There are additionally prices towards him to be paid and the continued prices of his authorized staff in his corruption trial, which can final a number of months till 2023.

Lately, Zuma additionally realized that his Nkandla residence, government-paid upgrades that contributed to his downfall, can be seized as a result of he had not repaid a $450,000 mortgage.

The mortgage was taken to cowl the tax on the refurbishment of the property close to Zuma’s birthplace within the Zulu homeland of KwaZulu-Natal.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept

Privacy & Cookies Policy