ICC upholds 25-year sentence for Dominic Ongwen – why it issues for Africa

The Worldwide Felony Court docket (ICC) has upheld its 25-year jail sentence in opposition to former Ugandan insurgent commander Dominic Ongwen. In a choice made on December 15, it has The ICC Appeals Chamber affirmedby majority, the sentence imposed final Might.

Ongwen was the primary The Lord’s Resistance Army leaders to be discovered responsible of the crimes throughout which 1000’s had been killed or displaced in northern Uganda.

- Advertisement -

His commander and Lord’s Resistance Military founder, Joseph Kony continues to be at giant. The US gives as much as 5 million USD for info resulting in his arrest.

Certainly one of Kony’s techniques through the 20 years of insurgency was abduction and conscription kids to his military. Ongwen was about 9 years previous when he was kidnapped. Lots of the former baby troopers surrendered to the Ugandan forces beneath an amnesty and had been relocated again to their communities.

Get information that is free, unbiased and evidence-based.

Get e-newsletter

In 2005, the ICC issued Pre-Trial Chamber II arrest warrants for Kony, Ongwen and three others senior leaders of the Lord’s Resistance Military for struggle crimes and crimes in opposition to humanity dedicated in northern Uganda.

On 6 Might 2021, the ICC sentenced him to 25 years in jail after discovering him responsible of 61 cases of war crimes and crimes against humanity. He appealed the jail sentence.

So why is the ruling on Ongwen’s enchantment essential to the African continent? There are 4 essential causes. ICC Appeals Chamber determination:

offers priority to compelled marriages and compelled pregnancies, promotes worldwide jurisprudence, addresses the difficulty of kid troopers; and underlines the position of ICC member states. Why it issues

Desire for compelled marriages and compelled pregnancies – ICC Trial Chamber convicted Ongwen of sexual and gender-related crimes of violence against seven women he stored in custody. Not like the crimes of enslavement, rape and sexual slavery, the crime of compelled marriage will not be explicitly established in Rome Statute.

Recognizing and deciphering compelled marriage as a separate crime in opposition to humanity was one critical step towards achieving justice for victims of sexual and gender-based violence on the Hague-based courtroom.

The Trial Chamber said that:

The crime of compelled marriage depends on the illegal confinement of a (compelled) pregnant girl, with the impact of depriving the girl of her reproductive autonomy.

This interpretation implies that judges will henceforth concentrate on girls’s vulnerability throughout armed conflicts.

Ongwen’s was additionally the primary case during which the ICC addressed the crime of compelled being pregnant. Equally essential to notice is the Trial Chamber’s emphasis on its expansive interpretation of the Rome Statute. It famous:

As with all crimes, compelled being pregnant should be interpreted in a means that offers this crime unbiased which means from the opposite sexual and gender-based violence crimes within the statute.

The Appeals Chamber emphasizes the necessity to shield girls’s reproductive well being, together with the precise to household planning.

The implication is that the prosecution of sexual and gender-based violence in armed conflicts and post-war contexts will most definitely enhance.

The sample of violating girls’s our bodies can’t be missed, even outdoors the context of armed battle. The express recognition of Ongwen victims’ experiences of hurt within the context of sexual and gender-based violence can handle socio-cultural injustices in opposition to girls in transitional contexts.

The ICC judgments within the Ongwen case are extremely related to feminist authorized students and advocates of gender-sensitive assessmentseen as an essential precedent for reproductive autonomy and rights.

The ICC due to this fact creates a very good precedent for analyzing the precarious scenario of victims of sexual and gender-based violence. This will probably be useful in conflicts like central African Republic, Congo-Kinshasa, Ethiopia and South Sudan.

Felony duty for former baby troopers – The Ongwen determination units an essential precedent on the difficulty of kid troopers. It permits courts in different African contexts to tell apart between kids as victims (baby troopers) and as perpetrators of crimes. The conscription of youngsters for fight is still a challenge in contexts such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Because of this ICC precedent, African courts can not exonerate former baby troopers from prison legal responsibility for crimes dedicated after they rose to senior command positions.

Assist from member states could be very essential – The investigation, give up and profitable prosecution of Ongwen value vital quantities to the financial system. It required assist from the state and different actors. It reveals the ICC’s dependence on member states’ cooperation to satisfy its mandate.

For instance, the Ugandan authorities referred the crimes of the Lord’s Resistance Military to the ICC. It additionally actively engaged in investigations and the supply of proof.

Going ahead, advocates for worldwide justice in Africa might want to work with ICC member states. They need to additionally search technical and monetary assist from donors and personal stakeholders.

Victims, consultants and teachers made essential contributions to this landmark case regulation on sexual and gender-based violence within the Ongwen case.

For different African nations coping with legacies of worldwide crimes and struggle crimes, the provision of ample finance and technical experience will probably be essential.

By Tonny Raymond Kirabira, Instructing Fellow, College of Portsmouth
Dennis Decide, PhD pupil, UMass Boston

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept

Privacy & Cookies Policy