In a previous article published on May 4, 2025, on the Hiiraan Online website, we discussed the challenges faced in the development of the Somali language. Specifically, we examined various Egyptian attempts to undermine efforts to create a standardized script for its use. In this follow-up piece, we will delve deeper into the historical context of these challenges while also reflecting on the progress that has been made over the decades.
- Advertisement -
According to a pivotal document from the United Nations, dated May 3, 1951 (UNOR “T/PET”. 11/40), the Somali Youth League (SYL) presented an alarming petition claiming that the Somali language and culture were essentially “underdeveloped.” The assertion that it possessed “very limited vocabulary” and “no literature at all” is a stark reminder of how misrepresentations can shape perceptions on a global scale. But the depth of this assertion—and its implications—go far beyond a mere lack of vocabulary.
In their petition, the SYL expressed profound concern over the difficulties Somalis faced in articulating their thoughts in their native tongue. They claimed, “It is extremely difficult to express ourselves adequately in the Somali language.” Reflecting on this statement, one might wonder: How often do we underestimate the richness of our languages due to perceived limitations?
The petition revealed a stark divide in opinions regarding which dialect of Somali should be adopted as the national language. Each regional group was adamant that their own dialect deserved this distinction. Ironically, when asked about the potential adoption of Arabic as a national language, there was little resistance.
The authors of the petition also reinforced a troubling narrative: “The Somali people are backward, and developing the Somali language is a gigantic task.” This perspective ironically overlooks the inherent wealth of the Somali language and disregards the intellectual potential within its speakers. Such narratives raise essential questions about cultural identity and self-worth. Do we need external validation to appreciate our languages and cultures?
In contrast, the authors extolled the virtues of the Arabic language, describing it as “highly developed” and rich in vocabulary. They went as far as to imply that acquiring Arabic would open a “vast ocean of culture” to the Somali people. As someone who enjoys linguistic exploration, I find this notion intriguing. Is embracing a language—any language—truly about gaining access to culture, or is it also about circumventing our own?
Over time, perceptions of the Somali language have evolved significantly. While the petition may have conceded that the Somali language lacked a unified written form, it was a misstep to declare it as merely a “local dialect.” Today, countless Somalis proudly speak a language that is rich in idioms, expressions, and literary tradition—qualities that were overlooked by earlier generations. The real challenge has been aligning on a standard alphabet.
In reflecting upon history, one can’t help but think of the resilience of people. The Somali community has rallied around the notion that language is not just a method of communication, but a vessel carrying their identity and cultural history. Isn’t it inspiring to think about how far they have come since those early days?
This piece aims not to disparage the intentions behind the SYL’s petition but instead to illuminate the misguided assumptions that have historically plagued perceptions of the Somali language. It leads us to a vital conclusion: our tongues can articulate profound truths, even in the face of adversity. As we ponder this, let us celebrate the Somali language for what it is—an evolving expression of culture and identity, rich with potential and history.
Embracing the Somali language today means recognizing its invaluable contribution to the tapestry of global culture, a commitment to its future, and an acknowledgment of the countless voices it represents. Every language holds stories waiting to be told, reflecting the diverse experiences of humanity itself.
Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times International – Monitoring.
