Investigating Allegations of War Crimes in Libya
- Advertisement -
Recently, the spotlight has turned to El Hishri, a former senior official at the Mitiga Prison complex in Tripoli, Libya. He is suspected of having committed serious war crimes and crimes against humanity during his tenure there. The allegations against El Hishri are harrowing, encompassing acts of murder, torture, and rape—some occurring directly under his supervision. One has to pause and reflect: how does one find themselves in such positions of power, only to exploit it in such a horrific manner?
The timeframe of these alleged crimes spans over a five-year period starting from 2015, casting a long shadow over the complex political and social landscape of post-revolution Libya. Yet, despite the gravity of the accusations, El Hishri has not publicly responded to them. This silence leaves many wondering about the accountability of individuals who hold such positions of power.
The Mitiga detention facility, located at the heart of Libya’s capital, has drawn considerable scrutiny over the years. Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International, have called it a “site of horrific violations committed with total impunity.” Such characterizations raise pressing questions about the mechanisms of oversight and accountability in a system that seems to have faltered in delivering justice.
It is worth noting that among those detained at Mitiga are migrants striving to reach Europe, often subjected to brutal, inhumane conditions. Imagine a young person, full of hope, risking everything to escape turmoil, only to find themselves trapped in a nightmare. What moral obligations do we have to support those who have already endured so much suffering?
El Hishri’s affiliations further complicate matters. He was connected with the Special Deterrence Force (SDF), also known as Rada, a group associated with the interior ministry of Libya’s internationally recognized government in Tripoli. His arrest comes amidst a broader investigation by the International Criminal Court (ICC) into crimes committed during Libya’s ongoing conflict. The question remains, how do these entities reconcile their commitment to human rights with their political allegiances?
Since the fall of Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, the ICC has issued 11 arrest warrants related to alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Libya. As we reflect on this grim history, it’s worth considering: is enough being done to hold those responsible accountable? Or are we allowing a cycle of impunity to continue unabated?
Ongoing ICC Efforts and Libya’s Cooperation
The ICC’s involvement in Libya began with a transformative moment: the United Nations Security Council referred the situation in the country to the Court in February 2011. Why was this significant? Because it marked a pivotal move toward international justice, condemning the use of force against civilians and widespread human rights abuses, including the suppression of peaceful demonstrators. Can we truly call ourselves advocates for human rights if we remain silent in the face of such atrocities?
Despite the issuance of 11 warrants, eight are still pending. Prominent suspects remain at large, such as Osama Najim, who was allegedly the director of the Mitiga detention center. His release earlier this year by Italian authorities was attributed to a so-called legal technicality, leaving many bewildered. The ICC made clear that this release occurred without their prior notice and has issued another warrant for his arrest. How can justice be served in such an environment of ambiguity?
As for El Hishri, he will remain in German custody while arrangements are made for his transfer to The Hague, where he will face proceedings at the ICC. This case adds to the ever-growing tapestry of accountability efforts for crimes committed during Libya’s post-2011 turmoil. Many see hope in these actions, but it’s crucial that we remain vigilant.
In a heartfelt statement, the ICC expressed its gratitude to the Libyan victims and witnesses who stepped forward to contribute to the investigation. Their courage and cooperation are seen as instrumental in advancing these crucial developments. Can we continue to advocate for such bravery, ensuring that those who have suffered continue being heard?
Importantly, in May 2025, Libya formally accepted the ICC’s jurisdiction for crimes committed within its borders from 2011 to the end of 2027. This acceptance is a crucial step, but it’s essential to recognize the ongoing complexities. The country remains politically fragmented, with power divided among rival governments and militias.
In this intricate landscape, the road to justice is fraught with challenges, yet it remains essential. So, as we follow these developments, let’s engage not just with the headlines but with the human stories behind them. Ultimately, each voice contributes a verse to the urgent song of justice—something we can all participate in.
Edited By Ali Musa
Axadle Times International – Monitoring.
